mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/linux-amlogic/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Xianwei Zhao <xianwei.zhao@amlogic.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Sunny Luo <sunny.luo@amlogic.com>, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
	linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org, linux-spi@vger.kernel.org,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] spi: Add Amlogic SPISG driver
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2025 15:02:22 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <03b7abe4-95d5-44f4-96ec-989c736e58b0@amlogic.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aG0hU5nbjLjTWS6p@finisterre.sirena.org.uk>

Hi Mark,
    Thanks for your advice.

On 2025/7/8 21:50, Mark Brown wrote:
> Subject:
> Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] spi: Add Amlogic SPISG driver
> From:
> Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
> Date:
> 2025/7/8 21:50
> 
> To:
> Xianwei Zhao <xianwei.zhao@amlogic.com>
> CC:
> Sunny Luo <sunny.luo@amlogic.com>, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>, 
> Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>, Conor Dooley 
> <conor+dt@kernel.org>, linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org, 
> linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, 
> linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> 
> 
> 
> On Tue, Jul 08, 2025 at 06:34:02PM +0800, Xianwei Zhao wrote:
>> On 2025/7/7 21:05, Mark Brown wrote:
>>> Is it worth having a copybreak such that smaller transfers are done
>>> using PIO?  With a lot of controllers that increases performance due to
>>> the extra overhead of setting up DMA, talking to the DMA and interrupt
>>> controllers can be as expensive as directly accessing the FIFOs.
>> If the data volume of a single transfer (xfer) is small, PIO mode does offer
>> some advantages. However, since PIO requires the CPU to wait in a busy loop
>> for the transfer to complete, it continuously occupies CPU resources. As a
>> result, its advantages are not particularly significant.
> The CPU overhead tends to be higher (you can avoid some of it with a
> dead reckoning sleep), but the latency vastly improved which for many
> applications is a worthwhile advantage.  It tends to be things like
> accesses to one or two registers on a device with registers where this
> wins, 16 bytes or lower would be a common number off the top of my head.
>
>> If PIO is to be implemented, it can only handle one transfer at a time (via
>> transfer_one), and not entire messages (which consist of multiple
>> transfers). In contrast, when processing messages, the SPI controller can
>> handle the entire sequence in one go, which also provides certain benefits.
> It's probably worth adding something to the framework to be able to take
> a decision at the message level, for writes this tends to all fall out
> naturally since the write will tend to be a single transfer anyway.

I will try to add new API message_can_dma for framework, and implement 
PIO for message.


_______________________________________________
linux-amlogic mailing list
linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-amlogic

  reply	other threads:[~2025-07-09  8:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-07-04  2:59 [PATCH v4 0/3] support for amlogic the new SPI IP Xianwei Zhao via B4 Relay
2025-07-04  2:59 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] spi: dt-bindings: Add binding document of Amlogic SPISG controller Xianwei Zhao via B4 Relay
2025-07-04  2:59 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] spi: Add Amlogic SPISG driver Xianwei Zhao via B4 Relay
2025-07-07 13:05   ` Mark Brown
2025-07-08 10:34     ` Xianwei Zhao
2025-07-08 13:50       ` Mark Brown
2025-07-09  7:02         ` Xianwei Zhao [this message]
2025-07-16  9:30           ` Xianwei Zhao
2025-07-16 16:25             ` Da Xue
2025-07-17  3:06               ` Xianwei Zhao
2025-07-08 16:01   ` Martin Blumenstingl
2025-07-09  6:29     ` Xianwei Zhao
2025-07-09  9:36       ` Martin Blumenstingl
2025-07-04  2:59 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] MAINTAINERS: Add an entry for Amlogic spi driver Xianwei Zhao via B4 Relay

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=03b7abe4-95d5-44f4-96ec-989c736e58b0@amlogic.com \
    --to=xianwei.zhao@amlogic.com \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-spi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=sunny.luo@amlogic.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®