mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/linux-amlogic/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Simon Huelck <simonmail@gmx.de>
To: Jose Abreu <jose.abreu@synopsys.com>,
	Sebastian Gottschall <s.gottschall@newmedia-net.de>,
	Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com>,
	Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>
Cc: linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	alexandre.torgue@st.com,
	Emiliano Ingrassia <ingrassia@epigenesys.com>,
	Gpeppe.cavallaro@st.com
Subject: Re: stmmac / meson8b-dwmac
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2019 20:02:16 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <12d1d6de-2905-46a8-6481-d6f20c8e9d85@gmx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c21c30e9-e53e-02a5-c367-25898c4614e9@synopsys.com>

Hi,


the thing is , that im not a stmmac developer. Yes , maybe i can bissect
it and yes you are lucky since im a C-developer since a long time for
embedded systems.

The problem is that i dont understand the structure of stmmac and im not
aware of any documentation about the driver structure nor the underlying
ethernet hardware ( even though im used to ethernet hardware in embedded
environment ). So how shall i recognize the relevant change between
4.14.29 and 5.0rc8 ?


Is it in the DTS/DTB, wrong hardware description ? Is it in the code ?
how is the duplex hardware working on this piece ?

I can try to support you the best i can, but i have little chances to
analyze it myself. At which measurements / counters is it possible to
see that duplex is fully working ?  Why did even the non-duplex
bandwidth regress from 900MBits to 650 ? Why is that 650 MBits dividing
up to TX and RX in summary when doing duplex ? Why is TX not starving in
duplex but RX ?

From my point of view should be the following things given:
- the non duplex bandwidth should be somewhere around 900MBits , the HW
is capable of that
- TX should not influence RX or vice versa in duplex
- the duplex bandwidth should be 900MBits in both directions ( maybe a
bit asymetric when buffers in both dirs are not same )

I guess we need some profiling on stmmac and ( at least i need ) more
knowledge of the hardware and stmmac itself. Can someone point me to the
driver documentation, describing the functions in the code and the
structure ? How can i profile stmmac ( usually im using hardware / JTAG
debuggers at work, but here @home i got nothing like that )

So how do we continue ?

regards,
Simon



Am 27.02.2019 um 12:09 schrieb Jose Abreu:
> Hi Simon,
>
> On 2/24/2019 8:34 PM, Simon Huelck wrote:
>> the topic is about ODROID C2 / Amlogic S905X since the start. we have a
>> performance regression since 4.14.
> As we are not advancing in this topic I suggest you try bisecting
> the offending commit.
>
> Thanks,
> Jose Miguel Abreu



_______________________________________________
linux-amlogic mailing list
linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-amlogic

  reply	other threads:[~2019-02-27 19:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <a38e643c-ed9f-c306-cc95-84f70ebc1f10@gmx.de>
     [not found] ` <CAFBinCDebPOsmrhSXecx48nGWHh7g_OGPbr1Y0M+n_v9Ht91ew@mail.gmail.com>
2019-01-17 21:23   ` Simon Huelck
2019-02-04 14:34     ` Martin Blumenstingl
2019-02-06 10:36       ` Emiliano Ingrassia
2019-02-06 18:04         ` Simon Huelck
2019-02-06 21:21         ` Simon Huelck
2019-02-07 19:30         ` Simon Huelck
2019-02-09  1:09           ` Martin Blumenstingl
2019-02-11 13:44             ` Jose Abreu
2019-02-14  7:21               ` Simon Huelck
2019-02-17 14:48               ` Martin Blumenstingl
2019-02-17 19:13                 ` Simon Huelck
2019-02-18  8:42                 ` Jose Abreu
2019-02-18  8:45                   ` Jose Abreu
2019-02-18 12:33                     ` Simon Huelck
2019-02-18 12:41                       ` Jose Abreu
2019-02-18 13:02                         ` Jose Abreu
2019-02-18 15:29                           ` Simon Huelck
2019-02-18 15:31                             ` Jose Abreu
2019-02-18 15:53                               ` Simon Huelck
2019-02-18 16:26                                 ` Jose Abreu
2019-02-18 16:40                                   ` Simon Huelck
2019-02-18 16:43                                     ` Jose Abreu
2019-02-18 16:51                                       ` Simon Huelck
2019-02-18 17:05                                         ` Jose Abreu
2019-02-18 18:05                                           ` Simon Huelck
2019-02-19  8:47                                             ` Jose Abreu
2019-02-19 19:41                                               ` Simon Huelck
2019-02-21 14:21                                                 ` Jerome Brunet
2019-02-21 17:27                                                   ` Simon Huelck
2019-02-21 17:46                                                     ` Jerome Brunet
2019-02-21 19:34                                                       ` Simon Huelck
2019-02-22 17:21                                                         ` Anand Moon
2019-02-24 15:00                                                       ` Simon Huelck
2019-02-24 15:02                                                         ` Simon Huelck
2019-02-24 19:42                                                         ` Sebastian Gottschall
2019-02-24 20:34                                                           ` Simon Huelck
2019-02-27 11:09                                                             ` Jose Abreu
2019-02-27 19:02                                                               ` Simon Huelck [this message]
2019-03-01  9:23                                                                 ` Jose Abreu
2019-03-05  9:55                                                                   ` Simon Huelck
2019-03-06 11:35                                                                     ` Simon Huelck
2019-03-06 11:45                                                                       ` Simon Huelck
2019-05-11 14:53                                                                   ` Simon Huelck
2019-05-13  9:07                                                                     ` Jose Abreu
2019-05-22 12:48                                                                       ` Simon Huelck
2019-05-22 14:02                                                                       ` Neil Armstrong
2019-02-27 21:03                                                               ` Simon Huelck
2019-02-18 17:05                                       ` Simon Huelck

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=12d1d6de-2905-46a8-6481-d6f20c8e9d85@gmx.de \
    --to=simonmail@gmx.de \
    --cc=Gpeppe.cavallaro@st.com \
    --cc=alexandre.torgue@st.com \
    --cc=ingrassia@epigenesys.com \
    --cc=jbrunet@baylibre.com \
    --cc=jose.abreu@synopsys.com \
    --cc=linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=s.gottschall@newmedia-net.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®