From: jbrunet@baylibre.com (Jerome Brunet)
To: linus-amlogic@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH/RFT] mmc: meson-gx: include tx phase in the tuning process
Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2017 14:30:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1506947411.17300.17.camel@baylibre.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1506529460.16686.45.camel@baylibre.com>
On Wed, 2017-09-27 at 18:24 +0200, Jerome Brunet wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-09-19 at 20:54 +0200, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
> > > > Unfortunately this still doesn't fix the issue here.
> > > > Tuning rx and tx clk sequentially assumes both are independent, what
> > > > they
> > > > IMHO are not. So meybe we have to check all combinations of rx/tx clk
> > > > phase.
> > >
> > > Interesting, I would be curious to know what tuning value you ended with,
> > > compared to the "hard-coded' working value you have set.
> > >
> > > You can get that fairly easily now, using CCF in debugfs, in
> > > <debugfs>/clk/clk_summary, the different phase are reported
> > >
> >
> > This gives me:
> >
> > core phase: 180
> > rx phase: 0
> > tx phase: 270
> >
> > And I end up with a corrupted root file system.
>
> You should have had tuning on both the Rx and Tx phase and yet, you end up
> with
> the default values ... that's strange
>
> I should be able to get my hands on 16GB emmc module for this platform soon.
> Let's see ...
So, I did some tests on the odroidc2 with the 16GB emmc module.
1) With Mainline + DTS patches (Waiting in Olof late branch) + the patch
proposed here:
mmc0: new HS200 MMC card at address 0001
mmcblk0: mmc0:0001 SDW16G 14.7 GiB
mmcblk0boot0: mmc0:0001 SDW16G partition 1 4.00 MiB
mmcblk0boot1: mmc0:0001 SDW16G partition 2 4.00 MiB
mmcblk0rpmb: mmc0:0001 SDW16G partition 3 4.00 MiB
mmcblk0: p1 p2 p3 p4
and clk_summary
d0074000.mmc#mux 1 1 1000000000 0 0
d0074000.mmc#div 1 1 200000000 0 0
d0074000.mmc#core 1 1 200000000 0 180
d0074000.mmc#rx 0 0 200000000 0 120
d0074000.mmc#tx 0 0 200000000 0 0
Note the tx phase tuning ended-up with the value you expected. I've done read
tests with this and there was no issue.
This made no sense with the value you reported but I thought maybe you did your
test in hs400 ... so I tested and it seems to be the case. In this mode, the
tuning value got reset.
This is because I mistakenly place the phase reset in POWER_ON instead of
POWER_UP.
The phase get reset every time the set_ios() is called, which is not what we
want.
With a few fix applied here, this is what I get:
# cat /sys/kernel/debug/mmc0/ios
clock: 200000000 Hz
actual clock: 166666667 Hz
vdd: 21 (3.3 ~ 3.4 V)
bus mode: 2 (push-pull)
chip select: 0 (don't care)
power mode: 2 (on)
bus width: 3 (8 bits)
timing spec: 10 (mmc HS400)
signal voltage: 1 (1.80 V)
driver type: 0 (driver type B)
clk_summary:
d0074000.mmc#mux 1 1 1000000000 0 0
d0074000.mmc#div 1 1 333333334 0 0
d0074000.mmc#core 1 1 333333334 0 180
d0074000.mmc#rx 0 0 333333334 0 120
d0074000.mmc#tx 0 0 333333334 0 0
No errors reported while doing read test using dd. Read throughput appears to be
around 220MB/s with this module.
I have posted a series with the fixes here:
https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171002122743.32334-1-jbrunet at baylibre.com
Jerome.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-02 12:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-09-09 13:14 Problems after recent changes to meson-gx-mmc driver Heiner Kallweit
2017-09-09 14:05 ` Jerome Brunet
2017-09-09 19:53 ` Heiner Kallweit
2017-09-09 20:20 ` Heiner Kallweit
2017-09-10 15:08 ` Jerome Brunet
2017-09-10 16:20 ` Heiner Kallweit
2017-09-10 16:48 ` Jerome Brunet
2017-09-18 13:44 ` [PATCH/RFT] mmc: meson-gx: include tx phase in the tuning process Jerome Brunet
2017-09-18 19:11 ` Heiner Kallweit
2017-09-19 11:08 ` Jerome Brunet
2017-09-19 18:54 ` Heiner Kallweit
2017-09-27 16:24 ` Jerome Brunet
2017-10-02 12:30 ` Jerome Brunet [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1506947411.17300.17.camel@baylibre.com \
--to=jbrunet@baylibre.com \
--cc=linus-amlogic@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®