mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/linux-amlogic/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com>
To: Xiaomeng Tong <xiam0nd.tong@gmail.com>
Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, broonie@kernel.org,
	khilman@baylibre.com, lgirdwood@gmail.com,
	linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com,
	narmstrong@baylibre.com, perex@perex.cz, stable@vger.kernel.org,
	tiwai@suse.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] soc: meson: fix a missing check on list iterator
Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2022 18:05:26 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1j35j374us.fsf@starbuckisacylon.baylibre.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220327130801.15631-1-xiam0nd.tong@gmail.com>


On Sun 27 Mar 2022 at 21:08, Xiaomeng Tong <xiam0nd.tong@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Sun, 27 Mar 2022 13:03:14 +0200, Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com> wrote:
>> On Sun 27 Mar 2022 at 16:18, Xiaomeng Tong <xiam0nd.tong@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> > The bug is here:
>> > 	*dai_name = dai->driver->name;
>> >
>> > For for_each_component_dais(), just like list_for_each_entry,
>> > the list iterator 'runtime' will point to a bogus position
>> > containing HEAD if the list is empty or no element is found.
>> > This case must be checked before any use of the iterator,
>> > otherwise it will lead to a invalid memory access.
>> >
>> > To fix the bug, just move the assignment into loop and return
>> > 0 when element is found, otherwise return -EINVAL;
>> 
>> Except we already checked that the id is valid and know an element will
>> be be found once we enter the loop. No bug here and this patch does not
>> seem necessary to me.
>
> Yea, you should be right, it is not a bug here. id already be checked before
> enter the loop:
>
> if (id < 0 || id >= component->num_dai)
>                 return -EINVAL;
>
> but if component->num_dai is not correct due to miscaculation or others reason
> and the door is reopened, this patch can avoid a invalid memory
> access.

This is a speculation which just does not hold ATM. What this patch does
is adding dead code cause the last "return -EINVAL;" will never be
reached.

This no fix nor improvement.

> Anyway,
> it is a good choice to use the list iterator only inside the loop, as linus
> suggested[1]. and we are on the way to change all these use-after-iter cases.
>
> [1]https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220217184829.1991035-1-jakobkoschel@gmail.com/

You can make improvements as long as the code is kept clean an
maintainable. Dead code is not OK.

_______________________________________________
linux-amlogic mailing list
linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-amlogic

      reply	other threads:[~2022-03-27 16:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-03-27  8:18 Xiaomeng Tong
2022-03-27 11:03 ` Jerome Brunet
2022-03-27 13:08   ` Xiaomeng Tong
2022-03-27 16:05     ` Jerome Brunet [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1j35j374us.fsf@starbuckisacylon.baylibre.com \
    --to=jbrunet@baylibre.com \
    --cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=khilman@baylibre.com \
    --cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com \
    --cc=narmstrong@baylibre.com \
    --cc=perex@perex.cz \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tiwai@suse.com \
    --cc=xiam0nd.tong@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®