From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3F287C433EF for ; Wed, 6 Jul 2022 17:22:07 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-reply-to: Date:Subject:Cc:To:From:References:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=n+JUezVqzNUUbXOvtOJC5qcmUByuGM5lQvt2Pm4AN0o=; b=x+3G4O6fPGtKD/ anRxSjoGM/x3NcY3PMiGqX0D7E6YPslM8gx5rD2fl5NeuIAjBtGozsW+1nGtRfvV2a8EsmKAxEgm+ +Ry1sLS2tf426IXdVzHr9mmo2kz172mHKRWLG518FMHMKfWIhT6SgpxK0ndcyjbT6pBe494i/5YhY KVCoyzVI3A2lcd7wZunBtMj+tMjtzSvXHd2InqNMJRKGu/e+MpI0eGzpDH7+RsUCbT6EKlPQbEFVS H4rVDTYncnnAnSlHpjFaXwGoq3F6SaSCkid63atJ3c/M9KIl8tS3s1TaOVY6F3ds6FbOTgvs1BA8b syOZqds31Y1TkMcYb8yA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1o98iq-00Bgel-W8; Wed, 06 Jul 2022 17:21:57 +0000 Received: from mail-wm1-x329.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::329]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1o98Wm-00BbU4-76 for linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 06 Jul 2022 17:09:35 +0000 Received: by mail-wm1-x329.google.com with SMTP id f190so9199915wma.5 for ; Wed, 06 Jul 2022 10:09:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=baylibre-com.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112; h=references:user-agent:from:to:cc:subject:date:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version; bh=5LUOM8ZYJNqDNXNRkK8SW6v1KeODGn/t/tSrSeB93Hg=; b=FWxQ9w9QQNjX8fhNNM4ShlZTIrizS+PKUFTG21pr1iRgQ7Vf64He23QLE9Bp6vZC9d QZu2/gYfSpYUu+IGln2mRJLyYTBfq/2oQnalM/9l2402od6QikiGfzuLSKyyHtUvM0ND H8c1Ve5FE8EFWb3V5w4SgEjotxtGfnYtzZH/0u8do8Ur8T0RcZirfEQuMgVoNg6hEjJl IFvuFdAFs7G+vCfMwzF+R9e5ptnM53k9g6vDUW9c9MrHQ6945QoFT/IiVHoXUxXm909V DfjWv/xGi1nJsBJDn0frsfD/P79LZl9yDkDVyV2rDWgVln6fVNSHmzJB+nvuFcX8uCDE vGYA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:references:user-agent:from:to:cc:subject:date :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version; bh=5LUOM8ZYJNqDNXNRkK8SW6v1KeODGn/t/tSrSeB93Hg=; b=XV0C2jXipPZddBVthn25ygXUG+QVtIqXXZY6NsSgFxu5FCxf9ydQsT/G02aELNQdep 3Odxylrlougi5c5rcJabICGBWZ49NZYQBBIf/ssL8Qnl4aOc+V+LpkbfpAKa9hyOJTQ2 P6Kr+1WKr+CsYfAD//61Ww+o1PfLZ2Kej14E49KK4dTCQ7smPjYW8o/4yKdimjYbHsKv LUV6Hypa+QUe5fUc2yOdkwPNPAUYI9H1vLw09qNK9a3xacQGv8JD7oVghShAE+dnAdd2 a7u+g8eToBie4IHvH+wSsrlaUoGaNJKk0kM1XG1ZV9eLUuEGqF0lvQyjiUDM4NGDeBSk ezMQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora8lLLtCl/cSzCXpLMqxOw1ZV7vamffB9oUABxxwdpUzFcNDnGA4 c6Yg9gGtFqtANQHJ33EzpKHWyQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1tDs+r809drkm9fTo8mDedQDX5NO3elMnVmkCGdj1wZQpsTYCLXuaPJsjJ/fdV04pS7uHNxFg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:1e14:b0:3a0:2bba:4b2e with SMTP id ay20-20020a05600c1e1400b003a02bba4b2emr42964111wmb.196.1657127362770; Wed, 06 Jul 2022 10:09:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (82-65-169-74.subs.proxad.net. [82.65.169.74]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m16-20020adfe950000000b0021d70a871cbsm5605291wrn.32.2022.07.06.10.09.22 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 06 Jul 2022 10:09:22 -0700 (PDT) References: <20220705142444.17063-1-pboos@baylibre.com> <1jmtdnwd7y.fsf@starbuckisacylon.baylibre.com> <20220706124139.GB492220@roeck-us.net> <1j8rp6z720.fsf@starbuckisacylon.baylibre.com> <20220706164325.GA776177@roeck-us.net> User-agent: mu4e 1.8.3; emacs 27.1 From: Jerome Brunet To: Guenter Roeck Cc: Jerome Brunet , Neil Armstrong , Philippe Boos , Wim Van Sebroeck , Kevin Hilman , Martin Blumenstingl , linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] watchdog: meson: keep running if already active Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2022 19:00:39 +0200 In-reply-to: <20220706164325.GA776177@roeck-us.net> Message-ID: <1j4jzuyxq8.fsf@starbuckisacylon.baylibre.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20220706_100928_302692_68C0ACB2 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 18.23 ) X-BeenThere: linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-amlogic" Errors-To: linux-amlogic-bounces+linux-amlogic=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Wed 06 Jul 2022 at 09:43, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On Wed, Jul 06, 2022 at 03:24:27PM +0200, Jerome Brunet wrote: >> > [ ... ] > >> >> No worries. That being said, I have gone over >> >> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst >> >> It just says that Reviewed-by sent on the list should be collected for >> the following version. Nothing against adding the tag if the job has >> been done, on or off list. Same goes for Suggested-by, Tested-by, etc. >> >> If I missed something or it is non-written rule, please let me know. > > Your interpretation is quite a strict one. I don't think there is a rule > that states that tags not sent to a list must not be collected. > > Anyway, I would have called it common sense, especially since it does > happen that someone accidentally hits "reply" instead of "reply all" > and replies end up not being sent to the list. If you expect me to dig > through e-mail headers to determine if you meant your tags to be published > or not, sorry, that won't happen. Do not send me e-mails with any tags > unless you accept that they may be published. > > Guenter Exactly. Not expecting anything. I'm 100% aligned with you. Maybe this is where is misunderstanding is. The Reviewed-by was there when Philippe sent his mail. I was meant to be there and taken. Plain and simple. No other expectation whatsoever. I'm not asking for the tag to dropped, quite the opposite actually. _______________________________________________ linux-amlogic mailing list linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-amlogic