From: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com>
To: Chuan Liu <chuan.liu@amlogic.com>
Cc: Chuan Liu via B4 Relay <devnull+chuan.liu.amlogic.com@kernel.org>,
Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com>,
Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>,
linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] clk: amlogic: optimize the PLL driver
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2025 17:27:58 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1j5xbvxchd.fsf@starbuckisacylon.baylibre.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9751014d-926e-4d42-b8e1-5a4d3e734457@amlogic.com> (Chuan Liu's message of "Fri, 31 Oct 2025 23:09:13 +0800")
On Fri 31 Oct 2025 at 23:09, Chuan Liu <chuan.liu@amlogic.com> wrote:
> Hi Jerome,
>
> On 10/31/2025 5:04 PM, Jerome Brunet wrote:
>> [ EXTERNAL EMAIL ]
>> On Fri 31 Oct 2025 at 16:10, Chuan Liu via B4 Relay
>> <devnull+chuan.liu.amlogic.com@kernel.org> wrote:
>>
>>> This patch series consists of four topics involving the amlogic PLL
>>> driver:
>>> - Fix out-of-range PLL frequency setting.
>>> - Improve the issue of PLL lock failures.
>>> - Add handling for PLL lock failure.
>>> - Optimize PLL enable timing.
>>>
>>> For easier review and management, these are submitted as a single
>>> patch series.
>>>
>>> The PLL timing optimization changes were merged into our internal
>>> repository quite some time ago and have been verified on a large
>>> number of SoCs:
>>> - Already supported upstream: G12A, G12B, SM1, S4, A1, C3.
>>> - Planned for upstream support: T7, A5, A4, S7, S7D, S6, etc.
>>>
>>> Based on the upstream code base, I have performed functional testing
>>> on G12A, A1, A5, A4, T7, S7, S7D, and S6, all of which passed.
>>>
>>> Additionally, stress testing using scripts was conducted on A5 and
>>> A1, with over 40,000 and 50,000 iterations respectively, and no
>>> abnormalities were observed. Below is a portion of the stress test
>>> log (CLOCK_ALLOW_WRITE_DEBUGFS has been manually enabled):
>> Okay, this little game has been going on long enough.
>> You've posted v2 24h hours ago
>> You've got feedback within hours
>> There was still a 1 question pending
>> The rest of community had no chance to review.
>>
>
> There might be a serious misunderstanding here.
>
> In recent years, we've mainly been maintaining our code in our
> internal repository, which has led to some differences between our
> internal codebase and the upstream version. The patches that account
> for these differences are already queued for submission, and several
> SoCs are also waiting in line to be submitted. As a result, quite a
> few patches have piled up, waiting to go upstream.
>
> Previously, I had been waiting for your clock driver restructuring
> patches to be ready (which have recently been merged), so for almost
> a year, we haven't made much progress on clock driver–related
> upstreaming.
Ohoh now you are just teasing me !
That work was made necessary because of all the copy/paste Amlogic was
submitting. Despite many requests, this was never addressed so I had
to step in.
If you want things to go faster, then *really* pay attention to the review
you are getting, do not ask question to ignore the answers and stop
making people repeat themselves over and over.
_______________________________________________
linux-amlogic mailing list
linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-amlogic
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-31 16:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-31 8:10 Chuan Liu via B4 Relay
2025-10-31 8:10 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] clk: amlogic: Fix out-of-range PLL frequency setting Chuan Liu via B4 Relay
2025-10-31 8:10 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] clk: amlogic: Improve the issue of PLL lock failures Chuan Liu via B4 Relay
2025-11-08 21:04 ` Martin Blumenstingl
2025-10-31 8:10 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] clk: amlogic: Add handling for PLL lock failure Chuan Liu via B4 Relay
2025-10-31 8:10 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] clk: amlogic: Optimize PLL enable timing Chuan Liu via B4 Relay
2025-10-31 9:04 ` [PATCH v3 0/4] clk: amlogic: optimize the PLL driver Jerome Brunet
2025-10-31 15:09 ` Chuan Liu
2025-10-31 16:27 ` Jerome Brunet [this message]
2025-11-04 5:28 ` Chuan Liu
2025-11-08 21:04 ` Martin Blumenstingl
2025-11-10 2:49 ` Chuan Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1j5xbvxchd.fsf@starbuckisacylon.baylibre.com \
--to=jbrunet@baylibre.com \
--cc=chuan.liu@amlogic.com \
--cc=devnull+chuan.liu.amlogic.com@kernel.org \
--cc=khilman@baylibre.com \
--cc=linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com \
--cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
--cc=neil.armstrong@linaro.org \
--cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome