mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/linux-amlogic/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Liam Zuiderhoek" <zuiderhoekl@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org, neil.armstrong@linaro.org,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] GPU: drm: meson: inline call to drm_simple_encoder_init()
Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2026 21:08:31 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260709210834.A72F31F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260709205538.73157-1-zuiderhoekl@gmail.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:

New issues:
- [Low] The commit message claims to inline `drm_simple_encoder_init()` for the meson driver, but it only modifies the HDMI encoder, leaving the deprecated helper in use by other encoders in the same driver.

Pre-existing issues:
- [High] The `meson_encoder_hdmi` structure (which embeds `struct drm_encoder`) is allocated with `devm_drm_bridge_alloc()`, but the encoder is initialized with `drm_encoder_init()`. This creates a mismatch in lifecycles that leads to a use-after-free when the platform device is unbound but userspace still holds a reference to the DRM device.
--

--- Patch [1]: [PATCH] GPU: drm: meson: inline call to drm_simple_encoder_init() ---
commit bb202202974455054588168b82acfc49ff85b23f
Author: Liam Zuiderhoek <zuiderhoekl@gmail.com>

GPU: drm: meson: inline call to drm_simple_encoder_init()

This commit inlines the function drm_simple_encoder_init for the meson
driver. It replaces the simple encoder init call with drm_encoder_init
and a custom cleanup struct.

> This commit inlines the function drm_simple_encoder_init for the meson
> driver. It replaces the simple encoder init call with drm_encoder_init
> and a custom cleanup struct.

[Severity: Low]
Does this commit miss updating other encoders in the meson driver?

The commit message implies it inlines the function for the meson driver as a
whole, but meson_encoder_cvbs_probe() in meson_encoder_cvbs.c and
meson_encoder_dsi_probe() in meson_encoder_dsi.c still use
drm_simple_encoder_init().

Additionally, is the include for <drm/drm_simple_kms_helper.h> still needed
in meson_encoder_hdmi.c now that the helper has been open-coded?

> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/meson/meson_encoder_hdmi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/meson/meson_encoder_hdmi.c
> index 0c7a72cb514ae..70a543358041f 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/meson/meson_encoder_hdmi.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/meson/meson_encoder_hdmi.c

[ ... ]

> @@ -407,8 +411,9 @@ int meson_encoder_hdmi_probe(struct meson_drm *priv)
>  	meson_encoder_hdmi->priv = priv;
>  
>  	/* Encoder */
> -	ret = drm_simple_encoder_init(priv->drm, &meson_encoder_hdmi->encoder,
> -				      DRM_MODE_ENCODER_TMDS);
> +	ret = drm_encoder_init(priv->drm, &meson_encoder_hdmi->encoder,
> +			       &drm_simple_encoder_funcs_cleanup,
> +			       DRM_MODE_ENCODER_TMDS, NULL);

[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does this allocation lifecycle mismatch
lead to a use-after-free?

Looking at meson_encoder_hdmi_probe(), the structure embedding the encoder is
allocated with devm_drm_bridge_alloc(), tying its lifetime to the platform
device:

meson_encoder_hdmi_probe() {
    ...
    meson_encoder_hdmi = devm_drm_bridge_alloc(priv->dev, ...);
    ...
}

However, the encoder is initialized here with drm_encoder_init(), tying its
cleanup to the DRM device's release.

If the platform device is unbound, devres automatically frees
meson_encoder_hdmi. If a userspace process holds an open file descriptor to
the DRM device during unbind, the DRM device outlives the platform device.

When the userspace process eventually closes the fd, drm_dev_release()
calls drm_mode_config_cleanup(), which iterates over the mode config list
and accesses the freed meson_encoder_hdmi->encoder to call its destroy
callback.

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260709205538.73157-1-zuiderhoekl@gmail.com?part=1

_______________________________________________
linux-amlogic mailing list
linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-amlogic

  reply	other threads:[~2026-07-09 21:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-09 20:55 Liam Zuiderhoek
2026-07-09 21:08 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-10  5:50 ` Martin Blumenstingl

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260709210834.A72F31F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=neil.armstrong@linaro.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=zuiderhoekl@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox