From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Pengpeng Hou" <pengpeng@iscas.ac.cn>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, neil.armstrong@linaro.org,
linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] drm/meson: dw-hdmi: Propagate reset failures during initialization
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2026 09:25:28 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260828092528.7720A1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260828091424.6375-1-pengpeng@iscas.ac.cn>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] The shared IRQ handler is registered before the hardware is fully initialized, risking a NULL pointer dereference if initialization fails.
- [High] Component bind error paths permanently leak `devm_` allocated resources.
--
commit f74bf01d3ded8b1822f2278b49d5f000e0d72a6b
Author: Pengpeng Hou <pengpeng@iscas.ac.cn>
drm/meson: dw-hdmi: Propagate reset failures during initialization
This commit updates meson_dw_hdmi_init() to propagate reset errors instead
of ignoring them. It also updates the bind and resume paths to abort if
initialization fails.
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/meson/meson_dw_hdmi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/meson/meson_dw_hdmi.c
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/meson/meson_dw_hdmi.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/meson/meson_dw_hdmi.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -754,7 +764,9 @@ static int meson_dw_hdmi_bind(struct device *dev, struct device *master,
> return ret;
> }
>
> - meson_dw_hdmi_init(meson_dw_hdmi);
> + ret = meson_dw_hdmi_init(meson_dw_hdmi);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does this new error path expose us to a
NULL pointer dereference from the shared IRQ?
Earlier in meson_dw_hdmi_bind(), a shared IRQ is requested using a devm_
function:
ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(dev, irq, dw_hdmi_top_irq,
dw_hdmi_top_thread_irq, IRQF_SHARED,
"dw_hdmi_top_irq", meson_dw_hdmi);
If meson_dw_hdmi_init() fails and returns early here, the IRQ remains active
because its lifetime is tied to the platform device, not the bind lifecycle.
If the shared IRQ fires, dw_hdmi_top_thread_irq() unconditionally
dereferences dw_hdmi->hdmi and dw_hdmi->bridge, which will be NULL since
dw_hdmi_probe() was skipped.
[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but does returning early here
also cause unbounded resource leaks?
Because meson_dw_hdmi_bind() is a component bind function, it runs
repeatedly on deferred probe or unbind/bind cycles. It allocates resources
using devm_ allocation functions, such as:
meson_dw_hdmi = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*meson_dw_hdmi),
GFP_KERNEL);
If this bind operation fails at meson_dw_hdmi_init(), these devm_ resources
are not automatically freed since the underlying platform device is not
destroyed. Can this lead to memory and IRQ exhaustion over time?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260828091424.6375-1-pengpeng@iscas.ac.cn?part=1
_______________________________________________
linux-amlogic mailing list
linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-amlogic
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-28 9:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-28 9:14 Pengpeng Hou
2026-08-28 9:25 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260828092528.7720A1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=neil.armstrong@linaro.org \
--cc=pengpeng@iscas.ac.cn \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®