From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Hans Zhang" <18255117159@163.com>
Cc: linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org, neil.armstrong@linaro.org,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 2/3] PCI: Configure Root Port MPS during host probing
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2026 15:51:42 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260916155143.2E31B1F000FF@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260916153907.60344-3-18255117159@163.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] pci: dangerous dynamic MPS reduction under PCIE_BUS_DEFAULT
--
commit 32945143b32b8b42f1dd3e1f419414a5bf8f9acf
Author: Hans Zhang <18255117159@163.com>
PCI: Configure Root Port MPS during host probing
This commit updates the PCIe initialization logic to set a Root Port's Maximum
Payload Size (MPS) to its maximum supported value during host controller
probing. It does this as long as the MPS strategy is not PCIE_BUS_TUNE_OFF or
PCIE_BUS_PEER2PEER, meaning it applies under the default PCIE_BUS_DEFAULT
strategy.
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/probe.c b/drivers/pci/probe.c
> index 232bce2819f06..08af75aa7366b 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/probe.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/probe.c
> @@ -2248,6 +2248,21 @@ static void pci_configure_mps(struct pci_dev *dev)
> return;
> }
>
> + /*
> + * Unless MPS strategy is PCIE_BUS_TUNE_OFF (don't touch MPS at all) or
> + * PCIE_BUS_PEER2PEER (use minimum MPS for peer-to-peer), set Root Ports'
> + * MPS to their maximum supported value. Depending on the MPS strategy
> + * and MPSS of downstream devices, a Root Port's MPS may be reduced
> + * later during device enumeration.
> + */
> + if (pci_pcie_type(dev) == PCI_EXP_TYPE_ROOT_PORT &&
> + pcie_bus_config != PCIE_BUS_TUNE_OFF &&
> + pcie_bus_config != PCIE_BUS_PEER2PEER) {
> + rc = pcie_set_mps(dev, 128 << dev->pcie_mpss);
[Severity: High]
Does this code introduce a regression where active downstream topologies are
exposed to dangerous dynamic MPS reductions under the default PCIE_BUS_DEFAULT
strategy?
By forcing the Root Port MPS to its maximum supported value here, it overrides
safe firmware settings. If a device with a smaller MPSS is subsequently
enumerated or hotplugged, pci_configure_mps() will detect that the downstream
MPSS is smaller than the Root Port's MPS, triggering pcie_reduce_mps() on the
entire hierarchy.
Because pcie_reduce_mps() modifies the Root Port first and sequentially walks
downstream without quiescing active devices, this creates a dangerous window.
If an existing downstream device (such as an active NIC or early
firmware-driven display controller) is actively performing DMA, could it
transmit a payload exceeding the newly reduced MPS of the Root Port,
potentially leading to Malformed TLP Fatal Errors and a system crash?
> + if (rc)
> + dev_warn(&dev->dev, "failed to set root port MPS\n");
> + }
> +
> if (!bridge || !pci_is_pcie(bridge))
> return;
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260916153907.60344-1-18255117159@163.com?part=2
_______________________________________________
linux-amlogic mailing list
linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-amlogic
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-16 15:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-16 15:39 [PATCH v9 0/3] " Hans Zhang
2026-09-16 15:39 ` [PATCH v9 1/3] PCI: Match the hierarchy's MPS to a device's MPSS as necessary Hans Zhang
2026-09-16 15:52 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-16 16:00 ` Hans Zhang
2026-09-16 15:39 ` [PATCH v9 2/3] PCI: Configure Root Port MPS during host probing Hans Zhang
2026-09-16 15:51 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-16 16:02 ` Hans Zhang
2026-09-16 15:39 ` [PATCH v9 3/3] PCI: dwc: Remove redundant MPS configuration Hans Zhang
2026-09-16 15:44 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260916155143.2E31B1F000FF@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=18255117159@163.com \
--cc=linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neil.armstrong@linaro.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®