From: Xianwei Zhao <xianwei.zhao@amlogic.com>
To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev
Cc: linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
robh@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, neil.armstrong@linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] i2c: amlogic: Add Amlogic A9 I2C controller driver
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2026 17:27:28 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <25203e40-ae4a-487c-a579-46e1c42f7917@amlogic.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <sashiko-outbox-188989@kernel.org>
hi,
On 2026/10/29 16:48, sashiko-bot@kernel.org wrote:
> Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 3 potential issue(s) to consider:
> - [High] i2c: amlogic-a9: missing threshold IRQ disable on timeout in aml_i2c_xfer_msg()
> - [Medium] i2c: amlogic-a9: transfer started before IRQ setup in aml_i2c_do_start()
> - [Medium] i2c: amlogic-a9: spurious TX FIFO write on completion in aml_i2c_irq()
> --
>
> commit ab8bf627f35c4931f8163555b700d4cca01277db
> Author: Junyi Zhao<junyi.zhao@amlogic.com>
>
> i2c: amlogic: Add Amlogic A9 I2C controller driver
>
> This commit adds an I2C controller driver for Amlogic A9 SoCs, along with
> corresponding Kconfig, Makefile, and MAINTAINERS entries.
>
>> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-amlogic-a9.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-amlogic-a9.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000000000..503511734fe26
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-amlogic-a9.c
> [ ... ]
>> +static void aml_i2c_put_data(struct aml_i2c *i2c, u8 *buf, int len)
>> +{
>> + int i;
>> +
>> + /* When this I2C module transfers 0 bytes, it must still send at least 1 byte. */
>> + if (!i2c->msg->len) {
>> + writel(0x00, i2c->regs + REG_CFG_TX);
>> + return;
>> + }
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < len; i++, buf++)
>> + writel(*buf, i2c->regs + REG_CFG_TX);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void aml_i2c_prepare_xfer(struct aml_i2c *i2c, enum fifo_fill_mode mode)
>> +{
>> + bool write = !(i2c->msg->flags & I2C_M_RD);
>> +
>> + if (!write)
>> + return;
>> +
>> + i2c->count = min(i2c->msg->len - i2c->pos,
>> + mode == A9_FIFO_FILL_FULL ? A9_I2C_FIFO_DEPTH : A9_I2C_HALF_FIFO);
>> + aml_i2c_put_data(i2c, i2c->msg->buf + i2c->pos, i2c->count);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static irqreturn_t aml_i2c_irq(int irqno, void *dev_id)
>> +{
> [ ... ]
>> + switch (i2c->state) {
>> + case A9_STATE_READ:
>> + buf = i2c->msg->buf;
>> + rd_len = min(i2c->msg->len - i2c->pos, A9_I2C_FIFO_DEPTH);
>> + for (i = 0; i < rd_len; i++) {
>> + rd_val = readl(i2c->regs + REG_CFG_RX);
>> + buf[i2c->pos++] = rd_val & TX_RX_DATA;
>> + }
>> + /* Rx must clear thresh after read fifo */
>> + clear_irq_status(i2c, A9_RX_THRESH_READ);
>> + break;
>> + case A9_STATE_WRITE:
>> + aml_i2c_prepare_xfer(i2c, A9_FIFO_FILL_HALF);
>> + if ((i2c->pos + A9_I2C_HALF_FIFO) >= i2c->msg->len)
>> + aml_i2c_set_mask(i2c, REG_CFG_IRQ_ENABLE, A9_TX_THRESH_WRITE, 0);
>> + i2c->pos += i2c->count;
>> + /* Tx must clear thresh after write fifo */
>> + clear_irq_status(i2c, A9_TX_THRESH_WRITE);
>> + break;
> [Severity: Medium]
> When a zero-length write message (i2c->msg->len == 0) is submitted via
> aml_i2c_xfer() -> aml_i2c_xfer_msg(), aml_i2c_prepare_xfer() calls
> aml_i2c_put_data() and writes 0x00 to REG_CFG_TX before starting the
> transfer.
>
> When the transfer finishes and A9_PHY_DONE triggers aml_i2c_irq(), the
> A9_STATE_WRITE case runs unconditionally without checking if bytes remain to
> be written or if A9_TX_THRESH_WRITE is set. Because i2c->msg->len is still 0,
> aml_i2c_prepare_xfer() -> aml_i2c_put_data() writes a second dummy 0x00 byte
> to REG_CFG_TX during completion.
>
> Also, given the comment in aml_i2c_put_data() noting that the hardware must
> send at least 1 byte when transferring 0 bytes, does a 0-byte transfer
> actually transmit a data byte on the bus? If the controller cannot perform
> true zero-length transfers, should aml_i2c_quirks set I2C_AQ_NO_ZERO_LEN
> since aml_i2c_func() advertises I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_EMUL (which includes SMBus
> Quick commands)?
>
Will add flag I2C_AQ_NO_ZERO_LEN in aml_i2c_quirks.
>> + default:
>> + break;
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (!(irq_state & A9_TRANS_DONE) ||
>> + (i2c->state == A9_STATE_READ && i2c->pos < i2c->msg->len))
>> + goto irq_trans_out;
>> +
>> +complete_irq_out:
>> + i2c->state = A9_STATE_IDLE;
>> + reset_fifo_pos(i2c);
>> + complete(&i2c->done);
>> + aml_i2c_set_mask(i2c, REG_CFG_IRQ_ENABLE, A9_RX_THRESH_READ | A9_TX_THRESH_WRITE, 0);
>> + clear_irq_status(i2c, IRQ_ALL_MASK);
>> +irq_trans_out:
>> + spin_unlock(&i2c->lock);
>> +
>> + return IRQ_HANDLED;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void aml_i2c_do_start(struct aml_i2c *i2c, struct i2c_msg *msg)
>> +{
>> + unsigned int reg_val;
>> + unsigned int trans_len;
>> +
>> + trans_len = msg->len;
>> + reg_val = (unsigned int)(((msg->addr & 0x7f) << START_SADDR_SHIFT) |
>> + ((msg->flags & I2C_M_RD) ? START_READ : 0) |
>> + ((trans_len & 0xfff) << START_LEN_SHIFT) | START_START);
>> + aml_i2c_set_mask(i2c, REG_CFG_START,
>> + START_START | START_SLAVE_ADDR | START_READ | START_LEN, reg_val);
>> + clear_irq_status(i2c, IRQ_ALL_MASK);
>> + /* enable thresh mode */
>> + if (trans_len > A9_I2C_FIFO_DEPTH) {
>> + reg_val = (msg->flags & I2C_M_RD) ? A9_RX_THRESH_READ : A9_TX_THRESH_WRITE;
>> + aml_i2c_set_mask(i2c, REG_CFG_IRQ_ENABLE,
>> + A9_RX_THRESH_READ | A9_TX_THRESH_WRITE, reg_val);
>> + }
>> +}
> [Severity: Medium]
> In aml_i2c_do_start(), START_START is written to REG_CFG_START before
> clear_irq_status(i2c, IRQ_ALL_MASK) is called and before the threshold
> interrupts are enabled in REG_CFG_IRQ_ENABLE.
>
> If execution is delayed between writing REG_CFG_START and clearing
> REG_CFG_IRQ_STATE (for instance on PREEMPT_RT where spin_lock_irqsave() does
> not disable preemption, or due to an NMI or hypervisor preemption), can the
> hardware assert A9_NCK_ERROR or A9_PHY_DONE for the new transfer only for
> clear_irq_status(i2c, IRQ_ALL_MASK) to immediately wipe it out, causing
> aml_i2c_irq() to miss A9_TRANS_DONE and wait_for_completion_timeout() in
> aml_i2c_xfer_msg() to time out?
>
This is a hardware-related issue. Some status bits can only be cleared
during startup. Changing the initialization sequence may cause data
transmission issues.
>> +
>> +static int aml_i2c_xfer_msg(struct aml_i2c *i2c, struct i2c_msg *msg, bool last)
>> +{
> [ ... ]
>> + if (!time_left) {
>> + spin_lock_irqsave(&i2c->lock, flags);
>> + i2c->state = A9_STATE_IDLE;
>> + clear_irq_status(i2c, IRQ_ALL_MASK);
>> + reset_fifo_pos(i2c);
>> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&i2c->lock, flags);
>> + return -ETIMEDOUT;
>> + }
> [Severity: High]
> When a transfer with msg->len > A9_I2C_FIFO_DEPTH (32 bytes) is started,
> aml_i2c_do_start() enables A9_RX_THRESH_READ or A9_TX_THRESH_WRITE in
> REG_CFG_IRQ_ENABLE.
>
> If that transfer times out in aml_i2c_xfer_msg(), this timeout path resets
> i2c->state, clears REG_CFG_IRQ_STATE, and resets the FIFO pointers, but
> unlike complete_irq_out in aml_i2c_irq(), it does not disable
> A9_RX_THRESH_READ | A9_TX_THRESH_WRITE in REG_CFG_IRQ_ENABLE, nor does it
> clear START_START in REG_CFG_START to halt the controller.
>
> When a subsequent transfer with msg->len <= A9_I2C_FIFO_DEPTH runs,
> aml_i2c_do_start() skips updating REG_CFG_IRQ_ENABLE:
>
> if (trans_len > A9_I2C_FIFO_DEPTH) {
> reg_val = (msg->flags & I2C_M_RD) ? A9_RX_THRESH_READ : A9_TX_THRESH_WRITE;
> aml_i2c_set_mask(i2c, REG_CFG_IRQ_ENABLE,
> A9_RX_THRESH_READ | A9_TX_THRESH_WRITE, reg_val);
> }
>
> Because aml_i2c_irq() dispatches strictly on i2c->state without checking
> which bit in irq_state triggered the interrupt, won't a stale
> A9_TX_THRESH_WRITE interrupt left enabled from a timed-out write fire during
> a subsequent <= 32-byte read (i2c->state == A9_STATE_READ), causing
> aml_i2c_irq() to read from an empty REG_CFG_RX FIFO into i2c->msg->buf while
> leaving A9_TX_THRESH_WRITE uncleared?
Will add clear A9_RX_THRESH_READ | A9_TX_THRESH_WRITE enable bit after
timeout.
_______________________________________________
linux-amlogic mailing list
linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-amlogic
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-30 9:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-29 8:33 [PATCH v3 0/2] i2c: Add driver support Amlogic A9 I2C Xianwei Zhao via B4 Relay
2026-10-29 8:33 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] dt-bindings: i2c: add Amlogic A9 I2C controller Xianwei Zhao via B4 Relay
2026-10-29 18:38 ` Conor Dooley
2026-10-29 8:33 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] i2c: amlogic: Add Amlogic A9 I2C controller driver Xianwei Zhao via B4 Relay
2026-10-29 8:48 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-30 9:27 ` Xianwei Zhao [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=25203e40-ae4a-487c-a579-46e1c42f7917@amlogic.com \
--to=xianwei.zhao@amlogic.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=neil.armstrong@linaro.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®