From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32A91C43381 for ; Fri, 29 Mar 2019 07:45:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ECD382173C for ; Fri, 29 Mar 2019 07:45:23 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="KMPX6PEN" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org ECD382173C Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=amlogic.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-amlogic-bounces+linux-amlogic=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From: References:To:Subject:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=S/E6f2eSyYfwFPfO5+V6wpqWKqqqGCOtJGPrdC2J7ho=; b=KMPX6PENSl/KzpuSzWEdcaqlG fkbNCKsfq6afX6Pnuw5w8vloGlxAK+6AywW2uBHYkhwRHpryhYvoPtU8PeUHDJtYXagAigpuaCWIi raiRkSnlMj76SLMOWgHEhOgBrJGCsfKg9dQb6Ui0XkCkYZmCN60II2E6Ck/ScUU6dDe+MXBlxyz8e qwGBbAExbJaYdhNSJvio8y/HwlCAcR/zw1FAoaEg+lZu2IwetoASUA0o3I1A8QovzbMjBlADof+j2 jT4VXtIg0av18VM/DBq/kssw15yOWDy2BKKHWyWODU03qa4gAgnq9j1HjjLsopSSqt8jsdPXOm7m5 zlnricIfQ==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1h9mCQ-00052v-Jy; Fri, 29 Mar 2019 07:45:14 +0000 Received: from mail-sz.amlogic.com ([211.162.65.117]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1h9mC9-0003gw-MD; Fri, 29 Mar 2019 07:44:59 +0000 Received: from [10.28.18.125] (10.28.18.125) by mail-sz.amlogic.com (10.28.11.5) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1591.10; Fri, 29 Mar 2019 15:44:30 +0800 Subject: Re: 32-bit Amlogic (ARM) SoC: kernel BUG in kfree() To: Martin Blumenstingl References: <20190321214401.GC19508@bombadil.infradead.org> <5cad2529-8776-687e-58d0-4fb9e2ec59b1@amlogic.com> <32799846-b8f0-758f-32eb-a9ce435e0b79@amlogic.com> From: Liang Yang Message-ID: <79b81748-8508-414f-c08a-c99cb4ae4b2a@amlogic.com> Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2019 15:44:30 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US X-Originating-IP: [10.28.18.125] X-ClientProxiedBy: mail-sz.amlogic.com (10.28.11.5) To mail-sz.amlogic.com (10.28.11.5) X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20190329_004457_971699_4EA81F29 X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 8.49 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-BeenThere: linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: mhocko@suse.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux@armlinux.org.uk, Matthew Wilcox , rppt@linux.ibm.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: "linux-amlogic" Errors-To: linux-amlogic-bounces+linux-amlogic=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Hi Martin, On 2019/3/29 2:03, Martin Blumenstingl wrote: > Hi Liang, [......] >> I don't think it is caused by a different NAND type, but i have followed >> the some test on my GXL platform. we can see the result from the >> attachment. By the way, i don't find any information about this on meson >> NFC datasheet, so i will ask our VLSI. >> Martin, May you reproduce it with the new patch on meson8b platform ? I >> need a more clear and easier compared log like gxl.txt. Thanks. > your gxl.txt is great, finally I can also compare my own results with > something that works for you! > in my results (see attachment) the "DATA_IN [256 B, force 8-bit]" > instructions result in a different info buffer output. > does this make any sense to you? > I have asked our VLSI designer for explanation or simulation result by an e-mail. Thanks. _______________________________________________ linux-amlogic mailing list linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-amlogic