[PATCH 2/2] drm: meson: rename driver name to meson-drm

[narmstrong@baylibre.com (Neil Armstrong)]

On 02/02/2017 11:45 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 10:47:44AM +0100, Neil Armstrong wrote:
>> The platform driver name is currently "meson" which can lead to some
>> confusion, this patch renames it to "meson-drm" and removes the owner
>> attribute.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/meson/meson_drv.c | 3 +--
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/meson/meson_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/meson/meson_drv.c
>> index ff1f601..380bde7 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/meson/meson_drv.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/meson/meson_drv.c
>> @@ -329,8 +329,7 @@ static int meson_drv_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>  	.probe      = meson_drv_probe,
>>  	.remove     = meson_drv_remove,
>>  	.driver     = {
>> -		.owner  = THIS_MODULE,

Hi Daniel,

> I don't get why you remove this, generally that will lead to trouble of
> being able to unload code that's still in use ...

Indeed, but since a (long ?) time, the owner field is now populated by the
 platform_driver_register() core code.

> 
> Otherwise ack.
> 
> Now, do you want to get this landed as part of the small drivers in
> drm-mis experiment?

I have a PR ready, but it can go through this experiment, yes.

> -Daniel
> 
>> -		.name   = DRIVER_NAME,
>> +		.name	= "meson-drm",
>>  		.of_match_table = dt_match,
>>  	},
>>  };
>> -- 

Thanks,
Neil