From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: afaerber@suse.de (=?UTF-8?Q?Andreas_F=c3=a4rber?=) Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2017 20:02:17 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 1/2] devicetree: Add vendor prefix for Hwacom Systems Inc. In-Reply-To: References: <20170212193247.22705-1-carlo@caione.org> <20170212193247.22705-2-carlo@caione.org> <20170222142558.wbedfw6l4maatkdy@rob-hp-laptop> Message-ID: To: linus-amlogic@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linus-amlogic.lists.infradead.org Am 27.02.2017 um 14:29 schrieb Rob Herring: > On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 3:45 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote: >> Rob Herring writes: >> >>> On Sun, Feb 12, 2017 at 08:32:46PM +0100, Carlo Caione wrote: >>>> From: Carlo Caione >>>> >>>> Hwacom Systems Inc. is a broadband system integrator and supplier of >>>> mobile, fixed and IP networks related services as well as >>>> multimedia application. Website: http://www.hwacom.com/ >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Carlo Caione >>>> --- >>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt | 1 + >>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) >>> >>> Acked-by: Rob Herring >> >> Rob, I assume I should take this patch along with the patch that's using >> this prefix? Or does this go through some other DT path? > > Yes, it should be applied with the rest of the series. Elsewhere Rob requested that "dt-bindings: " be used in $subject BTW. Does that not apply to vendor prefixes, or should Kevin fix that when applying? Regards, Andreas -- SUSE Linux GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 N?rnberg, Germany GF: Felix Imend?rffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton HRB 21284 (AG N?rnberg)