From: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
To: Viacheslav Bocharov <v@baodeep.com>,
Linus Walleij <linusw@kernel.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@kernel.org>
Cc: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com>,
Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com>,
Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Diederik de Haas <diederik@cknow-tech.com>,
linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] gpio: shared-proxy: always serialize with a sleeping mutex
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2026 07:54:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d8d407d5-ba6c-4197-9cf0-2fa7e6e17155@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260625115718.1678991-2-v@baodeep.com>
On 25.06.2026 13:57, Viacheslav Bocharov wrote:
> The shared GPIO descriptor used either a mutex or a spinlock, chosen at
> runtime from the underlying chip's can_sleep:
>
> shared_desc->can_sleep = gpiod_cansleep(shared_desc->desc);
> ... if (can_sleep) mutex_lock(); else spin_lock_irqsave();
>
> can_sleep describes only the value path (->get/->set). Under the same
> lock, however, the proxy may call gpiod_set_config() and
> gpiod_direction_*(), which can reach pinctrl paths that take a mutex
> (e.g. gpiod_set_config() -> gpiochip_generic_config() ->
> pinctrl_gpio_set_config()), independent of can_sleep. On a controller
> with non-sleeping MMIO value ops the descriptor lock was a spinlock, so
> the sleeping pinctrl call ran from atomic context. Reproduced on an
> Amlogic A113X board with the workaround from commit 28f240683871
> ("pinctrl: meson: mark the GPIO controller as sleeping") reverted; the
> original Khadas VIM3 report hit the same path:
>
> BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context
> __mutex_lock
> pinctrl_get_device_gpio_range
> pinctrl_gpio_set_config
> gpiochip_generic_config
> gpiod_set_config
> gpio_shared_proxy_set_config <- voting spinlock held
> ...
> mmc_pwrseq_simple_probe
>
> The spinlock existed to take the value vote from atomic context, but the
> vote and the (possibly sleeping) control operations share the same state
> and lock, so this scheme cannot serialize config under a mutex and still
> offer atomic value access. Always serialize the shared descriptor with a
> mutex instead and mark the proxy a sleeping gpiochip, driving the
> underlying GPIO through the cansleep value accessors: those are valid
> for both sleeping and non-sleeping chips, so value access keeps working
> on fast controllers, at the cost of no longer being atomic.
>
> This is observable: consumers gating on gpiod_cansleep() take their
> sleeping branch on a proxied GPIO (mmc-pwrseq-emmc skips its
> emergency-restart reset handler; its normal reset is unaffected), and
> consumers that reject sleeping GPIOs (pwm-gpio, ps2-gpio, ...) would
> fail to probe. Such atomic users do not share a pin through the proxy,
> whose purpose is voting on shared reset/enable lines. The same narrowing
> already applies on Amlogic since that workaround, and rockchip
> addressed the identical splat per-driver in commit 7ca497be0016 ("gpio:
> rockchip: Stop calling pinctrl for set_direction"); fixing the proxy
> addresses the locking error once, for every controller.
>
> The lock type was added by commit a060b8c511ab ("gpiolib: implement
> low-level, shared GPIO support"); the sleeping call under it arrived with
> the proxy driver.
>
> Fixes: e992d54c6f97 ("gpio: shared-proxy: implement the shared GPIO proxy driver")
> Reported-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/00107523-7737-4b92-a785-14ce4e93b8cb@samsung.com/
> Signed-off-by: Viacheslav Bocharov <v@baodeep.com>
Tested-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
> ---
> v1 -> v2: open-code the descriptor mutex; drop the gpio_shared_desc_lock
> guard and the gpio_shared_lockdep_assert() helper, use
> guard(mutex) and lockdep_assert_held() directly; move the
> mutex rationale from the header to the can_sleep assignment in
> probe.
>
> v1: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-gpio/20260610153329.937833-2-v@baodeep.com/
>
> drivers/gpio/gpio-shared-proxy.c | 66 +++++++++++++-------------------
> drivers/gpio/gpiolib-shared.c | 9 +----
> drivers/gpio/gpiolib-shared.h | 28 +-------------
> 3 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 74 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-shared-proxy.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-shared-proxy.c
> index 6941e4be6cf1..0cd52015b731 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-shared-proxy.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-shared-proxy.c
> @@ -9,8 +9,10 @@
> #include <linux/err.h>
> #include <linux/gpio/consumer.h>
> #include <linux/gpio/driver.h>
> +#include <linux/lockdep.h>
> #include <linux/mod_devicetable.h>
> #include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/mutex.h>
> #include <linux/string_choices.h>
> #include <linux/types.h>
>
> @@ -32,7 +34,7 @@ gpio_shared_proxy_set_unlocked(struct gpio_shared_proxy_data *proxy,
> struct gpio_desc *desc = shared_desc->desc;
> int ret = 0;
>
> - gpio_shared_lockdep_assert(shared_desc);
> + lockdep_assert_held(&shared_desc->mutex);
>
> if (value) {
> /* User wants to set value to high. */
> @@ -89,7 +91,7 @@ static int gpio_shared_proxy_request(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int offset)
> struct gpio_shared_proxy_data *proxy = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
> struct gpio_shared_desc *shared_desc = proxy->shared_desc;
>
> - guard(gpio_shared_desc_lock)(shared_desc);
> + guard(mutex)(&shared_desc->mutex);
>
> proxy->shared_desc->usecnt++;
>
> @@ -105,11 +107,11 @@ static void gpio_shared_proxy_free(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int offset)
> struct gpio_shared_desc *shared_desc = proxy->shared_desc;
> int ret;
>
> - guard(gpio_shared_desc_lock)(shared_desc);
> + guard(mutex)(&shared_desc->mutex);
>
> if (proxy->voted_high) {
> ret = gpio_shared_proxy_set_unlocked(proxy,
> - shared_desc->can_sleep ? gpiod_set_value_cansleep : gpiod_set_value, 0);
> + gpiod_set_value_cansleep, 0);
> if (ret)
> dev_err(proxy->dev,
> "Failed to unset the shared GPIO value on release: %d\n", ret);
> @@ -129,7 +131,7 @@ static int gpio_shared_proxy_set_config(struct gpio_chip *gc,
> struct gpio_desc *desc = shared_desc->desc;
> int ret;
>
> - guard(gpio_shared_desc_lock)(shared_desc);
> + guard(mutex)(&shared_desc->mutex);
>
> if (shared_desc->usecnt > 1) {
> if (shared_desc->cfg != cfg) {
> @@ -157,7 +159,7 @@ static int gpio_shared_proxy_direction_input(struct gpio_chip *gc,
> struct gpio_desc *desc = shared_desc->desc;
> int dir;
>
> - guard(gpio_shared_desc_lock)(shared_desc);
> + guard(mutex)(&shared_desc->mutex);
>
> if (shared_desc->usecnt == 1) {
> dev_dbg(proxy->dev,
> @@ -187,7 +189,7 @@ static int gpio_shared_proxy_direction_output(struct gpio_chip *gc,
> struct gpio_desc *desc = shared_desc->desc;
> int ret, dir;
>
> - guard(gpio_shared_desc_lock)(shared_desc);
> + guard(mutex)(&shared_desc->mutex);
>
> if (shared_desc->usecnt == 1) {
> dev_dbg(proxy->dev,
> @@ -222,13 +224,6 @@ static int gpio_shared_proxy_direction_output(struct gpio_chip *gc,
> return gpio_shared_proxy_set_unlocked(proxy, gpiod_direction_output, value);
> }
>
> -static int gpio_shared_proxy_get(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int offset)
> -{
> - struct gpio_shared_proxy_data *proxy = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
> -
> - return gpiod_get_value(proxy->shared_desc->desc);
> -}
> -
> static int gpio_shared_proxy_get_cansleep(struct gpio_chip *gc,
> unsigned int offset)
> {
> @@ -237,29 +232,15 @@ static int gpio_shared_proxy_get_cansleep(struct gpio_chip *gc,
> return gpiod_get_value_cansleep(proxy->shared_desc->desc);
> }
>
> -static int gpio_shared_proxy_do_set(struct gpio_shared_proxy_data *proxy,
> - int (*set_func)(struct gpio_desc *desc, int value),
> - int value)
> -{
> - guard(gpio_shared_desc_lock)(proxy->shared_desc);
> -
> - return gpio_shared_proxy_set_unlocked(proxy, set_func, value);
> -}
> -
> -static int gpio_shared_proxy_set(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int offset,
> - int value)
> -{
> - struct gpio_shared_proxy_data *proxy = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
> -
> - return gpio_shared_proxy_do_set(proxy, gpiod_set_value, value);
> -}
> -
> static int gpio_shared_proxy_set_cansleep(struct gpio_chip *gc,
> unsigned int offset, int value)
> {
> struct gpio_shared_proxy_data *proxy = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
>
> - return gpio_shared_proxy_do_set(proxy, gpiod_set_value_cansleep, value);
> + guard(mutex)(&proxy->shared_desc->mutex);
> +
> + return gpio_shared_proxy_set_unlocked(proxy, gpiod_set_value_cansleep,
> + value);
> }
>
> static int gpio_shared_proxy_get_direction(struct gpio_chip *gc,
> @@ -302,20 +283,25 @@ static int gpio_shared_proxy_probe(struct auxiliary_device *adev,
> gc->label = dev_name(dev);
> gc->parent = dev;
> gc->owner = THIS_MODULE;
> - gc->can_sleep = shared_desc->can_sleep;
> + /*
> + * Under the descriptor mutex the proxy may call
> + * gpiod_set_config()/gpiod_direction_*(), which can reach pinctrl
> + * paths that take a mutex (e.g. gpiod_set_config() ->
> + * gpiochip_generic_config() -> pinctrl_gpio_set_config()), independent
> + * of the underlying chip's can_sleep. So the descriptor lock must be a
> + * mutex and the proxy gpiochip is therefore always sleeping; drive the
> + * underlying GPIO through the cansleep value accessors, which are valid
> + * for both sleeping and non-sleeping chips.
> + */
> + gc->can_sleep = true;
>
> gc->request = gpio_shared_proxy_request;
> gc->free = gpio_shared_proxy_free;
> gc->set_config = gpio_shared_proxy_set_config;
> gc->direction_input = gpio_shared_proxy_direction_input;
> gc->direction_output = gpio_shared_proxy_direction_output;
> - if (gc->can_sleep) {
> - gc->set = gpio_shared_proxy_set_cansleep;
> - gc->get = gpio_shared_proxy_get_cansleep;
> - } else {
> - gc->set = gpio_shared_proxy_set;
> - gc->get = gpio_shared_proxy_get;
> - }
> + gc->set = gpio_shared_proxy_set_cansleep;
> + gc->get = gpio_shared_proxy_get_cansleep;
> gc->get_direction = gpio_shared_proxy_get_direction;
> gc->to_irq = gpio_shared_proxy_to_irq;
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-shared.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-shared.c
> index de72776fb154..495bd3d0ddf0 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-shared.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-shared.c
> @@ -627,8 +627,7 @@ static void gpio_shared_release(struct kref *kref)
>
> shared_desc = entry->shared_desc;
> gpio_device_put(shared_desc->desc->gdev);
> - if (shared_desc->can_sleep)
> - mutex_destroy(&shared_desc->mutex);
> + mutex_destroy(&shared_desc->mutex);
> kfree(shared_desc);
> entry->shared_desc = NULL;
> }
> @@ -659,11 +658,7 @@ gpiod_shared_desc_create(struct gpio_shared_entry *entry)
> }
>
> shared_desc->desc = &gdev->descs[entry->offset];
> - shared_desc->can_sleep = gpiod_cansleep(shared_desc->desc);
> - if (shared_desc->can_sleep)
> - mutex_init(&shared_desc->mutex);
> - else
> - spin_lock_init(&shared_desc->spinlock);
> + mutex_init(&shared_desc->mutex);
>
> return shared_desc;
> }
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-shared.h b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-shared.h
> index 15e72a8dcdb1..bbdc0ab7b647 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-shared.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-shared.h
> @@ -3,10 +3,7 @@
> #ifndef __LINUX_GPIO_SHARED_H
> #define __LINUX_GPIO_SHARED_H
>
> -#include <linux/cleanup.h>
> -#include <linux/lockdep.h>
> #include <linux/mutex.h>
> -#include <linux/spinlock.h>
>
> struct gpio_device;
> struct gpio_desc;
> @@ -42,35 +39,12 @@ static inline int gpio_shared_add_proxy_lookup(struct device *consumer,
>
> struct gpio_shared_desc {
> struct gpio_desc *desc;
> - bool can_sleep;
> unsigned long cfg;
> unsigned int usecnt;
> unsigned int highcnt;
> - union {
> - struct mutex mutex;
> - spinlock_t spinlock;
> - };
> + struct mutex mutex; /* serializes all proxy operations on this descriptor */
> };
>
> struct gpio_shared_desc *devm_gpiod_shared_get(struct device *dev);
>
> -DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_1(gpio_shared_desc_lock, struct gpio_shared_desc,
> - if (_T->lock->can_sleep)
> - mutex_lock(&_T->lock->mutex);
> - else
> - spin_lock_irqsave(&_T->lock->spinlock, _T->flags),
> - if (_T->lock->can_sleep)
> - mutex_unlock(&_T->lock->mutex);
> - else
> - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&_T->lock->spinlock, _T->flags),
> - unsigned long flags)
> -
> -static inline void gpio_shared_lockdep_assert(struct gpio_shared_desc *shared_desc)
> -{
> - if (shared_desc->can_sleep)
> - lockdep_assert_held(&shared_desc->mutex);
> - else
> - lockdep_assert_held(&shared_desc->spinlock);
> -}
> -
> #endif /* __LINUX_GPIO_SHARED_H */
Best regards
--
Marek Szyprowski, PhD
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
_______________________________________________
linux-amlogic mailing list
linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-amlogic
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-26 5:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-25 11:57 [PATCH v2 0/2] gpio: fix sleeping-in-atomic in shared-proxy; restore meson non-sleeping Viacheslav Bocharov
2026-06-25 11:57 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] gpio: shared-proxy: always serialize with a sleeping mutex Viacheslav Bocharov
2026-06-26 5:54 ` Marek Szyprowski [this message]
2026-06-26 7:16 ` Viacheslav
2026-06-26 15:01 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-06-30 22:31 ` Linus Walleij
2026-06-29 17:06 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-06-30 9:20 ` Viacheslav
2026-06-25 11:57 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] pinctrl: meson: restore non-sleeping GPIO access Viacheslav Bocharov
2026-06-25 12:14 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-30 22:31 ` Linus Walleij
2026-06-26 14:48 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] gpio: fix sleeping-in-atomic in shared-proxy; restore meson non-sleeping Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-07-01 7:27 ` (subset) " Bartosz Golaszewski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d8d407d5-ba6c-4197-9cf0-2fa7e6e17155@samsung.com \
--to=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=brgl@kernel.org \
--cc=diederik@cknow-tech.com \
--cc=jbrunet@baylibre.com \
--cc=khilman@baylibre.com \
--cc=linusw@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com \
--cc=neil.armstrong@linaro.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=v@baodeep.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox