Re: [RFC 06/11] soc: amlogic: clk-measure: Add support for SM1

From: Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com>
To: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>
Cc: khilman@baylibre.com, linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, jbrunet@baylibre.com
Subject: Re: [RFC 06/11] soc: amlogic: clk-measure: Add support for SM1
Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2019 13:44:54 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <eebfb5d6-21bf-f759-c74e-3eb7d04820e4@baylibre.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFBinCD8aBVo-WTaKTe7JyxqFyd=cVXDzHpwED4dx=rUtE3Uig@mail.gmail.com>

On 03/07/2019 01:51, Martin Blumenstingl wrote:
> Hi Neil,
> 
> On Mon, Jul 1, 2019 at 12:49 PM Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com> wrote:
>>
>> Add the clk-measurer clocks IDs for the Amlogic SM1 SoC family.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/soc/amlogic/meson-clk-measure.c | 134 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  1 file changed, 134 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/soc/amlogic/meson-clk-measure.c b/drivers/soc/amlogic/meson-clk-measure.c
>> index f09b404b39d3..e32e97613000 100644
>> --- a/drivers/soc/amlogic/meson-clk-measure.c
>> +++ b/drivers/soc/amlogic/meson-clk-measure.c
>> @@ -357,6 +357,136 @@ static struct meson_msr_id clk_msr_g12a[CLK_MSR_MAX] = {
>>         CLK_MSR_ID(122, "audio_pdm_dclk"),
>>  };
>>
>> +static struct meson_msr_id clk_msr_sm1[CLK_MSR_MAX] = {
>> +       CLK_MSR_ID(0, "ring_osc_out_ee_0"),
>> +       CLK_MSR_ID(1, "ring_osc_out_ee_1"),
>> +       CLK_MSR_ID(2, "ring_osc_out_ee_2"),
>> +       CLK_MSR_ID(3, "ring_osc_out_ee_3"),
>> +       CLK_MSR_ID(4, "gp0_pll"),
>> +       CLK_MSR_ID(5, "gp1_pll"),
>> +       CLK_MSR_ID(6, "enci"),
>> +       CLK_MSR_ID(7, "clk81"),
>> +       CLK_MSR_ID(8, "encp"),
>> +       CLK_MSR_ID(9, "encl"),
>> +       CLK_MSR_ID(10, "vdac"),
>> +       CLK_MSR_ID(11, "eth_tx"),
>> +       CLK_MSR_ID(12, "hifi_pll"),
>> +       CLK_MSR_ID(13, "mod_tcon"),
>> +       CLK_MSR_ID(14, "fec_0"),
>> +       CLK_MSR_ID(15, "fec_1"),
>> +       CLK_MSR_ID(16, "fec_2"),
>> +       CLK_MSR_ID(17, "sys_pll_div16"),
>> +       CLK_MSR_ID(18, "sys_cpu_div16"),
>> +       CLK_MSR_ID(19, "lcd_an_ph2"),
>> +       CLK_MSR_ID(20, "rtc_osc_out"),
>> +       CLK_MSR_ID(21, "lcd_an_ph3"),
>> +       CLK_MSR_ID(22, "eth_phy_ref"),
>> +       CLK_MSR_ID(23, "mpll_50m"),
>> +       CLK_MSR_ID(24, "eth_125m"),
>> +       CLK_MSR_ID(25, "eth_rmii"),
>> +       CLK_MSR_ID(26, "sc_int"),
>> +       CLK_MSR_ID(27, "in_mac"),
>> +       CLK_MSR_ID(28, "sar_adc"),
>> +       CLK_MSR_ID(29, "pcie_inp"),
>> +       CLK_MSR_ID(30, "pcie_inn"),
>> +       CLK_MSR_ID(31, "mpll_test_out"),
>> +       CLK_MSR_ID(32, "vdec"),
>> +       CLK_MSR_ID(34, "eth_mpll_50m"),
>> +       CLK_MSR_ID(35, "mali"),
>> +       CLK_MSR_ID(36, "hdmi_tx_pixel"),
>> +       CLK_MSR_ID(37, "cdac"),
>> +       CLK_MSR_ID(38, "vdin_meas"),
>> +       CLK_MSR_ID(39, "bt656"),
>> +       CLK_MSR_ID(40, "arm_ring_osc_out_4"),
>> +       CLK_MSR_ID(41, "eth_rx_or_rmii"),
>> +       CLK_MSR_ID(42, "mp0_out"),
>> +       CLK_MSR_ID(43, "fclk_div5"),
>> +       CLK_MSR_ID(44, "pwm_b"),
>> +       CLK_MSR_ID(45, "pwm_a"),
>> +       CLK_MSR_ID(46, "vpu"),
>> +       CLK_MSR_ID(47, "ddr_dpll_pt"),
>> +       CLK_MSR_ID(48, "mp1_out"),
>> +       CLK_MSR_ID(49, "mp2_out"),
>> +       CLK_MSR_ID(50, "mp3_out"),
>> +       CLK_MSR_ID(51, "sd_emmc_c"),
>> +       CLK_MSR_ID(52, "sd_emmc_b"),
>> +       CLK_MSR_ID(53, "sd_emmc_a"),
>> +       CLK_MSR_ID(54, "vpu_clkc"),
>> +       CLK_MSR_ID(55, "vid_pll_div_out"),
>> +       CLK_MSR_ID(56, "wave420l_a"),
>> +       CLK_MSR_ID(57, "wave420l_c"),
>> +       CLK_MSR_ID(58, "wave420l_b"),
>> +       CLK_MSR_ID(59, "hcodec"),
>> +       CLK_MSR_ID(40, "arm_ring_osc_out_5"),
> is this index 40 or 60?

Exact it's 60, thanks for spotting

> 
>> +       CLK_MSR_ID(61, "gpio_msr"),
>> +       CLK_MSR_ID(62, "hevcb"),
>> +       CLK_MSR_ID(63, "dsi_meas"),
>> +       CLK_MSR_ID(64, "spicc_1"),
>> +       CLK_MSR_ID(65, "spicc_0"),
>> +       CLK_MSR_ID(66, "vid_lock"),
>> +       CLK_MSR_ID(67, "dsi_phy"),
>> +       CLK_MSR_ID(68, "hdcp22_esm"),
>> +       CLK_MSR_ID(69, "hdcp22_skp"),
>> +       CLK_MSR_ID(70, "pwm_f"),
>> +       CLK_MSR_ID(71, "pwm_e"),
>> +       CLK_MSR_ID(72, "pwm_d"),
>> +       CLK_MSR_ID(73, "pwm_c"),
>> +       CLK_MSR_ID(74, "arm_ring_osc_out_6"),
>> +       CLK_MSR_ID(75, "hevcf"),
>> +       CLK_MSR_ID(74, "arm_ring_osc_out_7"),
> is this index 74 or 76?
> 

Exact, it's 76 !

Neil

_______________________________________________
linux-amlogic mailing list
linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-amlogic