From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jose.Abreu@synopsys.com (Jose Abreu) Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2017 14:27:45 +0000 Subject: [PATCH v3 4/6] drm: bridge: dw-hdmi: Switch to V4L bus format and encodings In-Reply-To: <28fe7ecf-cf4a-568a-b853-0506c088884d@baylibre.com> References: <1488904944-14285-1-git-send-email-narmstrong@baylibre.com> <1488904944-14285-5-git-send-email-narmstrong@baylibre.com> <977cfb29-af7a-2e28-7a7f-396d9ccf3eb8@synopsys.com> <28fe7ecf-cf4a-568a-b853-0506c088884d@baylibre.com> Message-ID: To: linus-amlogic@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linus-amlogic.lists.infradead.org Hi Neil, On 08-03-2017 12:12, Neil Armstrong wrote: > > Hi Jose, > > It seems here that we only have the RGB444<->YUV444 8bit tables, from the Amlogic > source I have the following for 10bit, 12bit and 16bit for itu601 : > > static const u16 csc_coeff_rgb_out_eitu601_10b[3][4] = { > { 0x2000, 0x6926, 0x74fd, 0x043b }, > { 0x2000, 0x2cdd, 0x0000, 0x7a65 }, > { 0x2000, 0x0000, 0x38b4, 0x78ea } > }; > > static const u16 csc_coeff_rgb_out_eitu601_12b_16b[3][4] = { > { 0x2000, 0x6926, 0x74fd, 0x10ee }, > { 0x2000, 0x2cdd, 0x0000, 0x6992 }, > { 0x2000, 0x0000, 0x38b4, 0x63a6 } > }; These two do not match anything I have here. > > static const u16 csc_coeff_rgb_in_eitu601_10b[3][4] = { > { 0x2591, 0x1322, 0x074b, 0x0000 }, > { 0x6535, 0x2000, 0x7acc, 0x0800 }, > { 0x6acd, 0x7534, 0x2000, 0x0800 } > }; This is more or less correct, I have small offsets. Note that I even have offsets with the values that are in dw-hdmi driver, which can be caused because I'm seeing the latest document that contain these values. I guess they were updated. > > static const u16 csc_coeff_rgb_in_eitu601_12b_16b[3][4] = { > { 0x2591, 0x1322, 0x074b, 0x0000 }, > { 0x6535, 0x2000, 0x7acc, 0x2000 }, > { 0x6acd, 0x7534, 0x2000, 0x2000 } > }; The same for this. > > But I miss the itu709 values. > > Could you confirm these values and maybe provide the itu709 values ? I will have to check if I can provide you the values. I will get back to you. Best regards, Jose Miguel Abreu > > Thanks ! > Neil >