From: liang.yang@amlogic.com (Liang Yang)
To: linus-amlogic@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH v2 2/2] mtd: rawnand: meson: add support for Amlogic NAND flash controller
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2018 21:21:48 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fdea2d54-7a68-64ec-8bb4-4a94677a3293@amlogic.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180824144810.31c929a5@bbrezillon>
Hi Boris,
On 8/24/2018 8:48 PM, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Aug 2018 22:08:42 +0800
> Liang Yang <liang.yang@amlogic.com> wrote:
>
>>> You have to wait tWB, that's for sure.
>>>
>> we have a maximum 32 commands fifo. when command is written into
>> NFC_REG_CMD, it doesn't mean that command is executing right now, maybe
>> it is buffering on the queue.Assume one ERASE operation, when 2nd
>> command(0xd0) is written into NFC_REG_CMD and then come into
>> NAND_OP_WAITRDY_INSTR, if I read the RB status by register, it may be
>> wrong because 0xd0 may not being executed. it is unusual unless
>> buffering two many command.
>
> You should flush the queue and wait for it to empty at the end of
> ->exec_op().
>
>> so it seems that i still need to use nand_soft_waitrdy or wait cmd is
>> executed somewhere.
>
> Don't you have a WAIT_FOR_RB instruction? What is NFC_CMD_RB for? Also,
> NFC_CMD_IDLE seems to allow you to add an arbitrary delay, and that's
> probably what you should use for tWB.
>
> em, I can wait for RB by reading the status from register now. but when
calling nand_soft_waitrdy, i really met a problem. One *jiffies* is
about 4ms. When programming, it pass 1ms to
instr->ctx.waitrdy.timeout_ms and nand_soft_waitrdy will be only one
*jiffies* to reach timeout. And then calling nand_soft_waitrdy maybe at
the tail of 4ms interval, it may only wait 100us and next jiffies
arrive. Is it correct?
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-08-28 13:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-07-19 9:46 [RFC PATCH v2 0/2] mtd: rawnand: meson: add Amlogic NAND driver support Yixun Lan
2018-07-19 9:46 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: nand: meson: add Amlogic NAND controller driver Yixun Lan
2018-07-19 9:57 ` Boris Brezillon
2018-07-19 10:07 ` Yixun Lan
2018-07-19 9:46 ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/2] mtd: rawnand: meson: add support for Amlogic NAND flash controller Yixun Lan
2018-08-01 21:50 ` Boris Brezillon
2018-08-02 14:04 ` Yixun Lan
2018-08-17 13:03 ` Liang Yang
2018-08-17 13:56 ` Boris Brezillon
2018-08-21 3:33 ` Liang Yang
2018-08-22 14:08 ` Liang Yang
2018-08-24 12:48 ` Boris Brezillon
2018-08-28 13:21 ` Liang Yang [this message]
2018-08-28 13:26 ` Boris Brezillon
2018-08-29 10:08 ` Liang Yang
2018-08-29 10:29 ` Liang Yang
2018-08-29 10:31 ` Boris Brezillon
2018-08-17 8:46 ` Boris Brezillon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=fdea2d54-7a68-64ec-8bb4-4a94677a3293@amlogic.com \
--to=liang.yang@amlogic.com \
--cc=linus-amlogic@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®