From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Haotian Zhang" <vulab@iscas.ac.cn>
Cc: linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org, neil.armstrong@linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: meson: axg-fifo: return a negative error code when no irq is found
Date: Fri, 09 Oct 2026 05:24:04 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-164882@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261009051724.3134644-1-vulab@iscas.ac.cn>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Low] soc: meson: dev_err() causes log spam on EPROBE_DEFER in axg_fifo_probe()
--
commit 267006c95b3ed8ed3ac0f11cabf3a8125d79bc3b
Author: Haotian Zhang <vulab@iscas.ac.cn>
ASoC: meson: axg-fifo: return a negative error code when no irq is found
This commit updates axg_fifo_probe() to return -EINVAL when of_irq_get()
returns 0. Previously, it returned 0 which caused the probe to succeed
erroneously, leading to failures later during request_threaded_irq().
> diff --git a/sound/soc/meson/axg-fifo.c b/sound/soc/meson/axg-fifo.c
> index 75909196b7698..fdbee44f5101c 100644
> --- a/sound/soc/meson/axg-fifo.c
> +++ b/sound/soc/meson/axg-fifo.c
> @@ -365,7 +365,7 @@ int axg_fifo_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> fifo->irq = of_irq_get(dev->of_node, 0);
> if (fifo->irq <= 0) {
> dev_err(dev, "failed to get irq: %d\n", fifo->irq);
[Severity: Low]
Does this unconditionally log an error even when of_irq_get() returns
-EPROBE_DEFER?
If of_irq_get() returns -EPROBE_DEFER (-517) because the IRQ controller is
not yet available during boot, the condition fifo->irq <= 0 is true and
dev_err() will generate log spam.
Since this error handling block is being updated, could this be changed to
use dev_err_probe() instead? This would correctly suppress deferral log
messages, as is done for other resources in axg_fifo_probe().
> - return fifo->irq;
> + return fifo->irq ?: -EINVAL;
> }
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261009051724.3134644-1-vulab@iscas.ac.cn?part=1
_______________________________________________
linux-amlogic mailing list
linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-amlogic
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-09 5:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-09 5:17 Haotian Zhang
2026-10-09 5:24 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-10-09 6:07 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-164882@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=neil.armstrong@linaro.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=vulab@iscas.ac.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®