From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S263909AbTLATku (ORCPT <rfc822;willy@w.ods.org>);
	Mon, 1 Dec 2003 14:40:50 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263918AbTLATkt
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Mon, 1 Dec 2003 14:40:49 -0500
Received: from pop.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:31872 "HELO mail.gmx.net")
	by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S263909AbTLATkt convert rfc822-to-8bit
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 1 Dec 2003 14:40:49 -0500
X-Authenticated: #3270670
From: "Thomas Babut" <thomas.babut@gmx.de>
To: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Clean up older Kernels
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2003 20:40:47 +0100
Message-ID: <000001c3b843$04f94330$5f00a8c0@tomek.lan>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.4510
Importance: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Hi,

perhaps my question is unusual, but why do you not clean up the older Linux
Kernels?

The Kernel 2.0.39 is the last stable one, but there is also a 2.0.40-rc6. So
why not releasing it as stable 2.0.40 (final)? And Alan Cox isn't active any
more for some time and the ac-Patches are very old. They could be removed,
or not?

:)

Bye
Thomas