From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264873AbUELB10 (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 May 2004 21:27:26 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264691AbUELB1Z (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 May 2004 21:27:25 -0400 Received: from host213-123-250-229.in-addr.btopenworld.com ([213.123.250.229]:13101 "EHLO 2003SERVER.sbs2003.local") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264873AbUELB1Q (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 May 2004 21:27:16 -0400 thread-index: AcQ3wLTj6fDeQmCwQGW9RoR0FlYUtw== X-Sieve: Server Sieve 2.2 Date: Wed, 12 May 2004 02:30:28 +0100 From: "Andrew Morton" To: Cc: , , Message-ID: <000001c437c0$b4e324d0$d100000a@sbs2003.local> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] PPC32: New OCP core support In-Reply-To: <20040511170150.A4743@home.com> References: <20040511170150.A4743@home.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.7 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i586-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailing-List: X-Loop: linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org Envelope-to: paul@sumlocktest.fsnet.co.uk Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message X-me-spamlevel: not-spam Importance: normal X-me-spamrating: 3.653973 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.132 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 12 May 2004 01:30:28.0328 (UTC) FILETIME=[B5021E80:01C437C0] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Matt Porter wrote: > > New OCP infrastructure ported from 2.4 along with several > enhancements. Please apply. I only received patch 1/2. Could you please avoid using the same Subject: for different patches? It confuses my auto-subject-to-patch-filename-munger and it's nice to more specifically identify each patch anwyay. ** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/