From: "Chen, Kenneth W" <kenneth.w.chen@intel.com>
To: "'Pete Zaitcev'" <zaitcev@redhat.com>,
"Matt Helsley" <matthltc@us.ibm.com>
Cc: "Erik Jacobson" <erikj@sgi.com>, <guillaume.thouvenin@bull.net>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] connector: Some fixes for ia64 unaligned access errors
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 18:07:08 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <000001c71d92$3aa76c70$e434030a@amr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20061211172907.305473cf.zaitcev@redhat.com>
Pete Zaitcev wrote on Monday, December 11, 2006 5:29 PM
> On Mon, 11 Dec 2006 15:52:47 -0800, Matt Helsley <matthltc@us.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> > I'm shocked memcpy() introduces 8-byte stores that violate architecture
> > alignment rules. Is there any chance this a bug in ia64's memcpy()
> > implementation? I've tried to read it but since I'm not familiar with
> > ia64 asm I can't make out significant parts of it in
> > arch/ia64/lib/memcpy.S.
>
> The arch/ia64/lib/memcpy.S is probably fine, it must be gcc doing
> an inline substitution of a well-known function.
arch/ia64/lib/memcpy.S is fine because it does alignment check at the very
beginning of the function and depends on the alignment of dst/src alignment,
it does different thing. The unaligned access is coming from gcc inlined
version of memcpy.
But looking deeply, memory allocation for proc_event in proc_for_connector
doesn't looked correct at all:
In drivers/connector/cn_proc.c:
#define CN_PROC_MSG_SIZE (sizeof(struct cn_msg) + sizeof(struct proc_event))
void proc_fork_connector(struct task_struct *task)
{
struct cn_msg *msg;
struct proc_event *ev;
__u8 buffer[CN_PROC_MSG_SIZE];
You can't do that because gcc assumes struct proc_event aligns on certain
boundary. Doing fancy hand crafting like that breaks code generated by gcc.
- Ken
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-12-12 2:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-12-07 23:22 Erik Jacobson
2006-12-09 3:20 ` Pete Zaitcev
2006-12-09 7:47 ` Matt Helsley
2006-12-09 21:09 ` Erik Jacobson
2006-12-10 2:34 ` Pete Zaitcev
2006-12-11 23:52 ` Matt Helsley
2006-12-12 1:29 ` Pete Zaitcev
2006-12-12 1:50 ` David Miller
2006-12-12 3:09 ` Matt Helsley
2006-12-12 3:41 ` David Miller
2006-12-12 2:07 ` Chen, Kenneth W [this message]
2006-12-11 23:52 ` Matt Helsley
2006-12-12 17:54 ` Erik Jacobson
2006-12-13 0:45 ` Andrew Morton
2006-12-13 2:31 ` Erik Jacobson
2006-12-13 2:38 ` Andrew Morton
2006-12-13 6:08 ` Erik Jacobson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='000001c71d92$3aa76c70$e434030a@amr.corp.intel.com' \
--to=kenneth.w.chen@intel.com \
--cc=erikj@sgi.com \
--cc=guillaume.thouvenin@bull.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthltc@us.ibm.com \
--cc=zaitcev@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome