From: "Chen, Kenneth W" <kenneth.w.chen@intel.com>
To: "'Jens Axboe'" <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
Cc: "Andrew Morton" <akpm@osdl.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Nick Piggin" <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>,
"Nick Piggin" <npiggin@suse.de>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] 4/4 block: explicit plugging
Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 14:34:38 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <000001c72f87$5bd8e520$ce34030a@amr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070103222930.GL11203@kernel.dk>
Jens Axboe wrote on Wednesday, January 03, 2007 2:30 PM
> > We are having some trouble with the patch set that some of our fiber channel
> > host controller doesn't initialize properly anymore and thus lost whole
> > bunch of disks (somewhere around 200 disks out of 900) at boot time.
> > Presumably FC loop initialization command are done through block layer etc.
> > I haven't looked into the problem closely.
> >
> > Jens, I assume the spin lock bug in __blk_run_queue is fixed in this patch
> > set?
>
> It is. Are you still seeing problems after the initial mail exchange we
> had prior to christmas,
Yes. Not the same kernel panic, but a problem with FC loop reset itself.
> or are you referencing that initial problem?
No. we got passed that point thanks for the bug fix patch you give me
prior to Christmas. That fixed a kernel panic on boot up.
> It's not likely to be a block layer issue, more likely the SCSI <->
> block interactions. If you mail me a new dmesg (if your problem is with
> the __blk_run_queue() fixups), I can take a look. Otherwise please do
> test with the __blk_run_queue() fixup, just use the current patchset.
I will just retake the tip of your plug tree and retest.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-01-03 22:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-01-03 7:48 [BLOCK] 0/4 explicit io plugging Jens Axboe
2007-01-03 7:48 ` [PATCH] 1/4 qrcu: "quick" srcu implementation Jens Axboe
2007-01-03 7:48 ` [PATCH] 2/4 qrcu: add rcutorture test Jens Axboe
[not found] ` <1167810508576-git-send-email-jens.axboe@oracle.com>
2007-01-03 8:09 ` [PATCH] 4/4 block: explicit plugging Andrew Morton
2007-01-03 8:22 ` Jens Axboe
2007-01-03 21:50 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2007-01-03 22:29 ` Jens Axboe
2007-01-03 22:34 ` Chen, Kenneth W [this message]
2007-01-04 14:39 ` Jens Axboe
2007-01-05 22:04 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2007-01-04 4:35 ` Nick Piggin
2007-01-05 7:23 ` Jens Axboe
2007-01-03 8:31 ` [PATCH] 3/4 qrcu: add documentation Jens Axboe
2007-01-03 9:29 ` Tomas Carnecky
2007-01-03 9:39 ` Jens Axboe
2007-01-03 9:41 ` [PATCH] 4/4 block: explicit plugging Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='000001c72f87$5bd8e520$ce34030a@amr.corp.intel.com' \
--to=kenneth.w.chen@intel.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
--cc=npiggin@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®