From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752653AbcGLItI (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Jul 2016 04:49:08 -0400 Received: from out4133-34.mail.aliyun.com ([42.120.133.34]:54329 "EHLO out4133-34.mail.aliyun.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750794AbcGLItF (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Jul 2016 04:49:05 -0400 X-Alimail-AntiSpam: AC=PASS;BC=-1|-1;BR=01201311R321e4;FP=0|-1|-1|-1|0|-1|-1|-1;HT=e02c03288;MF=hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com;NM=1;PH=DS;RN=6;SR=0;TI=SMTPD_----50KfjMg_1468313318; Reply-To: "Hillf Danton" From: "Hillf Danton" To: "'Mel Gorman'" Cc: "'Andrew Morton'" , "'Johannes Weiner'" , "'Vlastimil Babka'" , "'linux-kernel'" , References: <00ed01d1d1c8$fcb12ff0$f6138fd0$@alibaba-inc.com> <20160711152015.e3be8be7702fb0ca4625040d@linux-foundation.org> <013d01d1dc07$33896860$9a9c3920$@alibaba-inc.com> <20160712083342.GC9806@techsingularity.net> In-Reply-To: <20160712083342.GC9806@techsingularity.net> Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm, vmscan: Give up balancing node for high order allocations earlier Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2016 16:48:38 +0800 Message-ID: <000001d1dc1a$2f3afb30$8db0f190$@alibaba-inc.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: AQIjHdIxSD+aa8LumyDVvPFUA7jL6gHAokUpAaHpUoUCCLZLHJ9Gm81A Content-Language: zh-cn Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > This decision > was based on the fact the series did not appear to be over-reclaiming for > high-order pages when compared with zone-lru. > Then dropped. thanks Hillf