From: Satya Durga Srinivasu Prabhala <quic_satyap@quicinc.com>
To: 'Qais Yousef' <qais.yousef@arm.com>
Cc: <mingo@redhat.com>, <peterz@infradead.org>,
<juri.lelli@redhat.com>, <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
<dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>, <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
<bsegall@google.com>, <mgorman@suse.de>, <bristot@redhat.com>,
<vschneid@redhat.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: fix rq lock recursion issue
Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2022 19:06:56 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <000001d89013$e7bd4970$b737dc50$@quicinc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220630215310.wb3kab72tlh5pq2g@airbuntu>
On 6/30/22 2:53 PM, Qais Yousef wrote:
> Hi Satya
>
> On 06/24/22 00:42, Satya Durga Srinivasu Prabhala wrote:
>> Below recursion is observed in a rare scenario where __schedule()
>> takes rq lock, at around same time task's affinity is being changed,
>> bpf function for tracing sched_switch calls migrate_enabled(),
>> checks for affinity change (cpus_ptr != cpus_mask) lands into
>> __set_cpus_allowed_ptr which tries acquire rq lock and causing the
>> recursion bug.
>>
>> Fix the issue by switching to preempt_enable/disable() for non-RT
>> Kernels.
> Interesting bug. Thanks for the report. Unfortunately I can't see this being
> a fix as it just limits the bug visibility to PREEMPT_RT kernels, but won't fix
> anything, no? ie: Kernels compiled with PREEMPT_RT will still hit this failure.
Thanks for taking a look. That's right.
> I'm curious how the race with set affinity is happening. I would have thought
> user space would get blocked as __schedule() will hold the rq lock.
>
> Do you have more details on that?
I'm still trying to figure out how we even end with up such a race. No
easy way repro
the issue, I'm checking internally with some debug logs.
>
> Thanks
>
> --
> Qais Yousef
>
>> -010 |spin_bug(lock = ???, msg = ???)
>> -011 |debug_spin_lock_before(inline)
>> -011 |do_raw_spin_lock(lock = 0xFFFFFF89323BB600)
>> -012 |_raw_spin_lock(inline)
>> -012 |raw_spin_rq_lock_nested(inline)
>> -012 |raw_spin_rq_lock(inline)
>> -012 |task_rq_lock(p = 0xFFFFFF88CFF1DA00, rf = 0xFFFFFFC03707BBE8)
>> -013 |__set_cpus_allowed_ptr(inline)
>> -013 |migrate_enable()
>> -014 |trace_call_bpf(call = ?, ctx = 0xFFFFFFFDEF954600)
>> -015 |perf_trace_run_bpf_submit(inline)
>> -015 |perf_trace_sched_switch(__data = 0xFFFFFFE82CF0BCB8, preempt = FALSE, prev = ?, next = ?)
>> -016 |__traceiter_sched_switch(inline)
>> -016 |trace_sched_switch(inline)
>> -016 |__schedule(sched_mode = ?)
>> -017 |schedule()
>> -018 |arch_local_save_flags(inline)
>> -018 |arch_irqs_disabled(inline)
>> -018 |__raw_spin_lock_irq(inline)
>> -018 |_raw_spin_lock_irq(inline)
>> -018 |worker_thread(__worker = 0xFFFFFF88CE251300)
>> -019 |kthread(_create = 0xFFFFFF88730A5A80)
>> -020 |ret_from_fork(asm)
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Satya Durga Srinivasu Prabhala <quic_satyap@quicinc.com>
>> ---
>> kernel/sched/core.c | 8 ++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
>> index bfa7452ca92e..e254e9227341 100644
>> --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
>> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
>> @@ -2223,6 +2223,7 @@ static void migrate_disable_switch(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
>>
>> void migrate_disable(void)
>> {
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT
>> struct task_struct *p = current;
>>
>> if (p->migration_disabled) {
>> @@ -2234,11 +2235,15 @@ void migrate_disable(void)
>> this_rq()->nr_pinned++;
>> p->migration_disabled = 1;
>> preempt_enable();
>> +#else
>> + preempt_disable();
>> +#endif
>> }
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(migrate_disable);
>>
>> void migrate_enable(void)
>> {
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT
>> struct task_struct *p = current;
>>
>> if (p->migration_disabled > 1) {
>> @@ -2265,6 +2270,9 @@ void migrate_enable(void)
>> p->migration_disabled = 0;
>> this_rq()->nr_pinned--;
>> preempt_enable();
>> +#else
>> + preempt_enable();
>> +#endif
>> }
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(migrate_enable);
>>
>> --
>> 2.36.1
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-07-05 2:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-24 7:42 Satya Durga Srinivasu Prabhala
2022-06-30 21:53 ` Qais Yousef
2022-07-01 8:33 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-07-01 11:48 ` Qais Yousef
2022-07-04 8:32 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2022-07-06 3:42 ` Satya Durga Srinivasu Prabhala
2022-07-06 3:45 ` Satya Durga Srinivasu Prabhala
2022-07-06 3:46 ` Satya Durga Srinivasu Prabhala
2022-07-05 2:06 ` Satya Durga Srinivasu Prabhala [this message]
2022-06-30 22:37 ` Steven Rostedt
2022-07-01 15:54 ` Steven Rostedt
2022-07-06 3:44 ` Satya Durga Srinivasu Prabhala
[not found] ` <000101d89013$f2157320$d6405960$@quicinc.com>
2022-07-05 7:24 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-07-06 3:40 ` Satya Durga Srinivasu Prabhala
2022-07-06 3:47 ` Satya Durga Srinivasu Prabhala
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='000001d89013$e7bd4970$b737dc50$@quicinc.com' \
--to=quic_satyap@quicinc.com \
--cc=bristot@redhat.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=qais.yousef@arm.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®