From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from vps0.lunn.ch (vps0.lunn.ch [156.67.10.101]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3633E34A3C4; Wed, 7 Jan 2026 17:31:40 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=156.67.10.101 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1767807103; cv=none; b=dp1BLSrjWpLGTs+4UtKXJQB8Ha6lmbmbI1OrvsPZDSgKQU479oz02FyMRuxXKlutKvyCveDq5m77d3eg1qY/ft8YAA9IH5V0PobHjCSbJDED7NAosXCwo479WgRrX9/LiYzoH7kJQWyz9blRtytZHTOf0AQuWG6NFLS/oQOT5p4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1767807103; c=relaxed/simple; bh=STJkh8Ybg0FTqQCs6HFtlRNhgJiwg7Qi5xrVh47nvhI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=rjqcAiaNJDlmdeH0Sgl0Zuwkg6ohi8BPepV5Ixic4Mo50CUTRNDhBB8ZZVsor1OdzFAPQ+gM/hxCRm9ALLxyqSXJ7cuINr6/edQAe2gZV1bH/fzBKadCWB0aBq2GqSIvK/S22QmHvy3dpc8WwyqrwJ+00QDe63o5tVPGgEbtzwA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lunn.ch; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lunn.ch; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=lunn.ch header.i=@lunn.ch header.b=Rzf9wKZO; arc=none smtp.client-ip=156.67.10.101 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lunn.ch Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lunn.ch Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=lunn.ch header.i=@lunn.ch header.b="Rzf9wKZO" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lunn.ch; s=20171124; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Disposition:Content-Type:MIME-Version: References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:From:Sender:Reply-To:Subject: Date:Message-ID:To:Cc:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To:References; bh=8+5pL9ii5SD5d+0EKkLqda2QSulYIArq9zhWN7r2gxk=; b=Rzf9wKZOImcX0VlW5/RM8Fzxsy 453as1VrOz7SqoMKUJKY7KUxs4lmsF1WBd76AjfRWJwy9uUWARmkIbXuXBRd/rl9HSktwp3p6uzIp 3dE6TSlv+gXv2PtxuA0YlfYHw6APntUvhqw8L14uBAqVWpSQQWJG55Hk7St81QnM2ZI8=; Received: from andrew by vps0.lunn.ch with local (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1vdXNI-001puP-IS; Wed, 07 Jan 2026 18:31:12 +0100 Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2026 18:31:12 +0100 From: Andrew Lunn To: Ivan Vecera Cc: Rob Herring , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Lunn , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Vadim Fedorenko , Arkadiusz Kubalewski , Grzegorz Nitka , Jiri Pirko , Petr Oros , Michal Schmidt , Prathosh Satish , Tony Nguyen , Przemek Kitszel , Saeed Mahameed , Leon Romanovsky , Tariq Toukan , Mark Bloch , Richard Cochran , Jonathan Lemon , Simon Horman , Alexander Lobakin , Willem de Bruijn , Stefan Wahren , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, Horatiu Vultur Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC net-next 01/13] dt-bindings: net: ethernet-controller: Add DPLL pin properties Message-ID: <0000750a-e08e-45c7-a039-5eb754f6e37c@lunn.ch> References: <20251211194756.234043-1-ivecera@redhat.com> <20251211194756.234043-2-ivecera@redhat.com> <2de556f0-d7db-47f1-a59e-197f92f93d46@lunn.ch> <20251217004946.GA3445804-robh@kernel.org> <5db81f5b-4f35-46e4-8fec-4298f1ac0c4e@redhat.com> <66815c08-8408-4651-b039-d47925ae125e@redhat.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <66815c08-8408-4651-b039-d47925ae125e@redhat.com> > > I have no idea what makes sense for ACPI and little interest in > > reviewing ACPI bindings. While I think the whole idea of shared > > bindings is questionable, really it's a question of review bandwidth > > and so far no one has stepped up to review ACPI bindings. > > It depends... shared bindings allow drivers to read property values > without need to have separate OF and ACPI codepaths. Do you have real hardware in your hands using ACPI? Andrew