From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 6 May 2001 14:17:21 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 6 May 2001 14:17:11 -0400 Received: from moutvdom00.kundenserver.de ([195.20.224.149]:50530 "EHLO moutvdom00.kundenserver.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 6 May 2001 14:17:04 -0400 Message-ID: <000b01c0d658$a19163a0$3303a8c0@pnetz> From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Christian_Borntr=E4ger?= To: "Jussi Laako" Cc: In-Reply-To: <200105051626.SAA16651@cave.bitwizard.nl> <3AF4824F.8964E53B@home.com> <3AF57F63.9900089E@pp.htv.fi> Subject: Re: Athlon possible fixes Date: Sun, 6 May 2001 20:16:11 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Hmm, I'm wondering if this could be same bug that I'm seeing with ASUS > A7V133 & Duron/800 when using IDE autotuning (PDC20265). > Still haven't got any replies suggesting any reason for lockups I'm seeing > (no oopses). Or is the Promise driver just buggy, because system is solid > with noautotune. RAID5 (md) on that server is just little bit sluggish with OK. I tried it on my A7V133 system and leaving out autotune (just for Promise, where I connected the hard discs) makes the system stable. I thought my problem is related to the Athlon compile problem I read in this group, but now I am not sure. Can you try and mail me if the Kernel 2.4.3 (without any ac patch) is stable with your system even if you use autotune? "Downgrade" to this kernel works fine for me. greetings Christian Bornträger