From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757419Ab0IJA1O (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Sep 2010 20:27:14 -0400 Received: from sm-d311v.smileserver.ne.jp ([203.211.202.206]:33094 "EHLO sm-d311v.smileserver.ne.jp" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753215Ab0IJA1N (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Sep 2010 20:27:13 -0400 Message-ID: <000c01cb507e$e8d0a3c0$66f8800a@maildom.okisemi.com> From: "Masayuki Ohtake" To: "Linus Walleij" Cc: "Grant Likely" , , "LKML" , "David Brownell" , , , , , , "Tomoya MORINAGA" , "Thomas Gleixner" , "David Woodhouse" References: <000a01cb4b2b$f03c6d40$66f8800a@maildom.okisemi.com> Subject: Re: [MeeGo-Dev][PATCH] Topcliff: Update PCH_SPI driver to 2.6.35 Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2010 09:27:05 +0900 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1983 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1983 X-Hosting-Pf: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 2 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Linus, Thank you for your checking. > If you incluse ChangeLogs it's easier to follow the development, > thanks. The latest patch has included the following Changelog. > Topcliff PCH is the platform controller hub that is going to be used in > Intel's upcoming general embedded platform. All IO peripherals in > Topcliff PCH are actually devices sitting on AMBA bus. > Topcliff PCH has SPI I/F. Using this I/F, it is able to access system > devices connected to SPI. Do you mean the above our Changelog is lack of something ? Thanks, Ohtake(OKISemi) ----- Original Message ----- From: "Linus Walleij" To: "Masayuki Ohtake" Cc: "Grant Likely" ; ; "LKML" ; "David Brownell" ; ; ; ; ; ; "Tomoya MORINAGA" ; "Thomas Gleixner" ; "David Woodhouse" Sent: Friday, September 10, 2010 5:58 AM Subject: Re: [MeeGo-Dev][PATCH] Topcliff: Update PCH_SPI driver to 2.6.35 > 2010/9/3 Masayuki Ohtake : > > > Each instance of our SPI device has the same vendor ID and device ID. > > Thus, I think it is impossible to be called probe() for each instance. > > Looking at you latest patch it appears you could :-) > That solves the problem pretty nicely. > If you incluse ChangeLogs it's easier to follow the development, > thanks. > > Linus Walleij >