From: Jingoo Han <jg1.han@samsung.com>
To: "'Dmitry Torokhov'" <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Cc: "'Linus Torvalds'" <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"'Andrew Morton'" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"'Jingoo Han'" <jg1.han@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: Dangerous devm_request_irq() conversions
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 16:12:36 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <000c01ce10cb$fdd4a4a0$f97dede0$%han@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130222065345.GA30816@core.coreip.homeip.net>
On Friday, February 22, 2013 3:54 PM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> It looks like a whole slew of devm_request_irq() conversions just got
> applied to mainline and many of them are quite broken.
>
> Consider fd5231ce336e038037b4f0190a6838bdd6e17c6d or
> c1879fe80c61f3be6f2ddb82509c2e7f92a484fe: the drivers udsed first to
> free IRQ and then unregister the corresponding device ensuring that IRQ
> handler, while it runs, has the device available. The mechanic
> conversion to devm_request_irq() reverses the order of these operations
> opening the race window where IRQ can reference device (or other
> resource) that is already gone.
>
> It would be nice if these could be reverted and revioewed again for
> correctness.
Um, other RTC drivers already have been using devm_request_threaded_irq() or
devm_request_irq() like this, before I added these patches.
For example,
./drivers/rtc/rtc-tegra.c
./drivers/rtc/rtc-spear.c
./drivers/rtc/rtc-s3c.c
./drivers/rtc/rtc-mxc.c
./drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1553.c
./drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1511.c
./drivers/rtc/rtc-snvs.c
./drivers/rtc/rtc-imxdi.c
./drivers/rtc/rtc-tx4939.c
./drivers/rtc/rtc-mv.c
./drivers/rtc/rtc-coh901331.c
./drivers/rtc/rtc-stk17ta8.c
./drivers/rtc/rtc-lpc32xx.c
./drivers/rtc/rtc-tps65910.c
./drivers/rtc/rtc-rc5t583.c
Also, even more, some RTC drivers calls rtc_device_unregister() first,
then calls free_irq() later.
For example,
./drivers/rtc/rtc-vr41xx.c
./drivers/rtc/rtc-da9052.c
./drivers/rtc/rtc-isl1208.c
./drivers/rtc/rtc-88pm860x.c
./drivers/rtc/rtc-tps6586x.c
./drivers/rtc/rtc-mpc5121.c
./drivers/rtc/rtc-m48t59.c
Please, don't argue revert without concrete reasons.
If these devm_request_threaded_irq() or devm_request_irq() make the problem,
devm_free_irq() will be added later.
>
> In general any conversion to devm_request_irq() needs double and triple
> checking.
>
> Thanks.
>
> --
> Dmitry
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-22 7:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-02-22 6:53 Dmitry Torokhov
2013-02-22 7:12 ` Jingoo Han [this message]
2013-02-22 7:26 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2013-02-22 7:57 ` Jingoo Han
2013-02-22 8:05 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2013-02-22 18:24 ` 'Tejun Heo'
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='000c01ce10cb$fdd4a4a0$f97dede0$%han@samsung.com' \
--to=jg1.han@samsung.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®