mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Chen, Kenneth W" <kenneth.w.chen@intel.com>
To: "'Zach Brown'" <zach.brown@oracle.com>
Cc: "'Andrew Morton'" <akpm@osdl.org>, <linux-aio@kvack.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"'Benjamin LaHaise'" <bcrl@kvack.org>, <suparna@in.ibm.com>
Subject: RE: [patch] aio: add per task aio wait event condition
Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 17:16:55 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <000d01c72ed4$dbc78920$ff0da8c0@amr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0DF58573-AC11-4732-B48C-76401C1A222D@oracle.com>

Zach Brown wrote on Tuesday, January 02, 2007 4:49 PM
> On Dec 29, 2006, at 6:31 PM, Chen, Kenneth W wrote:
> > This patch adds a wait condition to the wait queue and only wake-up
> > process when that condition meets.  And this condition is added on a
> > per task base for handling multi-threaded app that shares single  
> > ioctx.
> 
> But only one of the waiting tasks is tested, the one at the head of  
> the list.  It looks like this change could starve a io_getevents()  
> with a low min_nr in the presence of another io_getevents() with a  
> larger min_nr.
> 
> > +	if (waitqueue_active(&ctx->wait)) {
> > +		struct aio_wait_queue *wait;
> > +		wait = container_of(ctx->wait.task_list.next,
> > +				    struct aio_wait_queue, wait.task_list);
> > +		if (nr_evt >= wait->nr_wait)
> > +			wake_up(&ctx->wait);
> > +	}
> 
> First is the fear of starvation as mentioned previously.
> 
> issue 2 ops
> first io_getevents sleeps with a min_nr of 2
> second io_getevents sleeps with min_nr of 3
> 2 ops complete but only test the second sleeper's min_nr of 3
> first sleeper twiddles thumbs

That is not possible because when multiple tasks waiting for events, they
enter the wait queue in FIFO order, prepare_to_wait_exclusive() does
__add_wait_queue_tail().  So first io_getevents() with min_nr of 2 will
be woken up when 2 ops completes.


  reply	other threads:[~2007-01-03  1:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-12-30  2:31 Chen, Kenneth W
2007-01-03  0:49 ` Zach Brown
2007-01-03  1:16   ` Chen, Kenneth W [this message]
2007-01-03  1:23     ` Zach Brown
2007-01-03  1:50       ` Chen, Kenneth W
2007-01-03  2:06         ` Zach Brown
2007-01-03  2:32           ` Chen, Kenneth W
2007-01-03  6:36           ` Chen, Kenneth W
2007-01-03 18:50             ` Zach Brown
2007-02-01 21:46               ` Jeff Moyer
2007-02-01 22:21                 ` Zach Brown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='000d01c72ed4$dbc78920$ff0da8c0@amr.corp.intel.com' \
    --to=kenneth.w.chen@intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=bcrl@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-aio@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=suparna@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=zach.brown@oracle.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®