From: Andreas Franck <afranck@gmx.de>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Mike Galbraith <mikeg@wen-online.de>
Subject: Re: Fatal Oops on boot with 2.4.0testX and recent GCC snapshots
Date: Sun, 24 Dec 2000 23:49:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <00122423490000.00575@dg1kfa.ampr.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.Linu.4.10.10012231826350.645-100000@mikeg.weiden.de>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.Linu.4.10.10012231826350.645-100000@mikeg.weiden.de>
Hello Mike, hello linux-kernel hackers,
Mike Galbraith wrote:
> Yes, hmm indeed. Try these two things.
>
> 1. make DECLARE_MUTEX_LOCKED(sem) in bdflush_init() static.
> 2. compile with frame pointers. (normal case for IKD)
>
> My IKD tree works with either option, but not with neither. I haven't
> figured out why yet.
1 worked for me, too - with the same effect as compiling buffer.c with
2.95.2, thus meaning successful boot and heavy crashing later on.
I haven't tried to boot 2 yet, but this looks seriously fishy to me. It would
be nice if we could make a simpler testcase to reproduce it, as it's much
work to boot the kernel over and over again.
I have now printed out the buffer.c:bdflush_init assembly for all four cases,
2.95.2, 2.97 without patch, 2.97 with static DECLARE... and 2.97 with frame
pointer, and will try to figure out what's going wrong - it would still be
nice to know if its a gcc problem or if some kernel assumption about GCC
behaviour triggered this bug, which seems equally likely, as kernel_thread
and the mutex/semaphore stuff involve some nontrivial (at least for beginners
like me...) hand-made assembly code.
A nice evening and still merry christmas to the people westward of Europe :-)
Andreas
--
->>>----------------------- Andreas Franck --------<<<-
---<<<---- Andreas.Franck@post.rwth-aachen.de --->>>---
->>>---- Keep smiling! ----------------------------<<<-
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-12-24 23:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-12-23 11:34 Andreas Franck
2000-12-23 17:33 ` Mike Galbraith
2000-12-23 19:14 ` Andreas Franck
2000-12-24 16:13 ` Mike Galbraith
2000-12-24 0:21 ` Andreas Franck
2000-12-24 22:49 ` Andreas Franck [this message]
2000-12-25 5:09 ` Mike Galbraith
2000-12-25 12:29 ` Andreas Franck
2000-12-25 17:45 ` Mike Galbraith
2000-12-25 16:12 ` Andreas Franck
2000-12-25 18:00 ` Mike Galbraith
2000-12-25 20:40 ` Thorsten Kranzkowski
2000-12-26 7:03 ` Paul Laufer
[not found] <Pine.Linu.4.10.10012271823370.471-100000@mikeg.weiden.de>
[not found] ` <00122801060000.00534@dg1kfa.ampr.org>
2000-12-28 0:26 ` Andreas Franck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=00122423490000.00575@dg1kfa.ampr.org \
--to=afranck@gmx.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mikeg@wen-online.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®