mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ashton Mills" <amills@iinet.com.au>
To: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Bug Report: Reduced disk performance in 2.6.1
Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 19:25:03 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <001c01c3d824$cbf26ab0$0a01a8c0@mart> (raw)

Following the bug reporting guide at www.kernel.org.

Sending to linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org because I don't know where the
problem lies, I've eliminated two areas (detailed below).

PROBLEM:

Stock 2.6.1 kernel shows reduced disk performance compared to stock 2.6.0.

DESCRIPTION:

2.6.0 -- hdparm -Tt shows:

~70 M/s for a single drive
~110 M/s for 2-drive software RAID 0 array

2.6.1 -- hdparm -Tt shows:

~60 M/s for single drive
~90 M/s for 2-drive software RAID 0 array

Kernel configuration file the same -- used .config from 2.6.0 with make
oldconfig

Reproducible: yes. Results remain consistent between the two kernels.

This is the only change to the system. No other software or hardware was
changed, just a straight kernel upgrade.

Relevant specs:

Athlon-XP 2800+
1024M RAM
Adaptec 29160
Two Maxtor 10k RPM U160 SCSI drives in md software RAID 0 array

Linux version 2.6.1 (root@Agamemnon) (gcc version 3.3.2 20031218 (Gentoo
Linux 3.3.2-r5, propolice-3.3-7))

PROGRESS:

Patched 2.6.1 with the 2.6.0 aic7xxx SCSI driver in case it was a result of
the new .36 version of the driver.
Result: problem remains

Patched 2.6.1 with the 2.6.0 md driver, since that was also shown to be
updated in 2.6.1
Result: problem remains

So, it doesn't appear to be a SCSI or md driver issue. Don't know where to
go from here, reporting as bug.


                 reply	other threads:[~2004-01-11  8:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='001c01c3d824$cbf26ab0$0a01a8c0@mart' \
    --to=amills@iinet.com.au \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®