mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Masayuki Ohtake" <masa-korg@dsn.okisemi.com>
To: "Greg KH" <gregkh@suse.de>
Cc: <meego-dev@meego.com>, "LKML" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<qi.wang@intel.com>, <yong.y.wang@intel.com>,
	<andrew.chih.howe.khor@intel.com>, <arjan@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [MeeGo-Dev][PATCH] Topcliff: Update PCH_IEEE1588 driver to 2.6.35
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2010 16:29:25 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <002601cb3926$edaf24d0$66f8800a@maildom.okisemi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100810171343.GE21220@suse.de>

Hi Greg,

> Do they all have to be ioctls?  What exactly are they doing?
I think using ioctl is common for this patch.
Do you think that using ioctl is NOT appropriate for this patch?
Let me know your intension in more detail.

>
> And are they 32/64bit safe?
Only 32bit support.

Thanks, Ohtake
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Greg KH" <gregkh@suse.de>
To: "Masayuki Ohtak" <masa-korg@dsn.okisemi.com>
Cc: <meego-dev@meego.com>; "LKML" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>; <qi.wang@intel.com>; <yong.y.wang@intel.com>;
<andrew.chih.howe.khor@intel.com>; <arjan@linux.intel.com>
Sent: Wednesday, August 11, 2010 2:13 AM
Subject: Re: [MeeGo-Dev][PATCH] Topcliff: Update PCH_IEEE1588 driver to 2.6.35


> On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 07:32:04PM +0900, Masayuki Ohtak wrote:
> > IEEE1588 driver of Topcliff PCH
> >
> > Topcliff PCH is the platform controller hub that is going to be used in
> > Intel's upcoming general embedded platform. All IO peripherals in
> > Topcliff PCH are actually devices sitting on AMBA bus.
> > Topcliff PCH has IEEE1588 I/F. This driver enables IEEE1588 function on CAN or
> > Ethernet communications.
>
> So it's a CAN or Ethernet driver?  If so, why isn't this a network
> driver like the CAN and Ethernet drivers?
>
> > +#ifdef __GNUC__
> > +#define UNUSED __attribute__ ((unused))
> > +#define UNUSED_ARG(x)
> > +#else
> > +#define UNUSED
> > +#define UNUSED_ARG(x) (void) x
> > +#endif
> > +
> > +
> > +#define TRUE 1
> > +#define FALSE 0
>
> These lines should not be needed at all.
>
> > +#define IOC_1588_BASE 0xf8
>
> Do you have documentation for these new ioctls you are creating?  It's a
> lot of them:
>
> > +#define IOCTL_1588_PORT_CONFIG_SET \
> > + _IOW(IOC_1588_BASE, 0, struct pch_portcfg_ioctl)
> > +
> > +#define IOCTL_1588_PORT_CONFIG_GET \
> > + _IOWR(IOC_1588_BASE, 1, struct pch_portcfg_ioctl)
> > +
> > +#define IOCTL_1588_RX_POLL _IOWR(IOC_1588_BASE, 2, struct pch_rxtxpoll_ioctl)
> > +
> > +#define IOCTL_1588_TX_POLL _IOWR(IOC_1588_BASE, 3, struct pch_rxtxpoll_ioctl)
> > +
> > +#define IOCTL_1588_CAN_POLL _IOWR(IOC_1588_BASE, 4, struct pch_canpoll_ioctl)
> > +
> > +#define IOCTL_1588_SYS_TIME_GET _IOR(IOC_1588_BASE, 5, struct pch_tim_val)
> > +
> > +#define IOCTL_1588_SYS_TIME_SET _IOW(IOC_1588_BASE, 6, struct pch_tim_val)
> > +
> > +#define IOCTL_1588_TICK_RATE_SET _IOW(IOC_1588_BASE, 7, __u32)
> > +
> > +#define IOCTL_1588_TICK_RATE_GET _IOR(IOC_1588_BASE, 8, __u32)
> > +
> > +#define IOCTL_1588_TARG_TIME_INTRPT_ENABLE _IO(IOC_1588_BASE, 9)
> > +
> > +#define IOCTL_1588_TARG_TIME_INTRPT_DISABLE _IO(IOC_1588_BASE, 10)
> > +
> > +#define IOCTL_1588_TARG_TIME_POLL \
> > + _IOR(IOC_1588_BASE, 11, struct pch_timepoll_ioctl)
> > +
> > +#define IOCTL_1588_TARG_TIME_SET \
> > + _IOW(IOC_1588_BASE, 12, struct pch_tim_val)
> > +
> > +#define IOCTL_1588_TARG_TIME_GET \
> > + _IOR(IOC_1588_BASE, 13, struct pch_tim_val)
> > +
> > +#define IOCTL_1588_AUX_TIME_INTRPT_ENABLE _IOW(IOC_1588_BASE, 14,\
> > + enum pch_auxmode)
> > +
> > +#define IOCTL_1588_AUX_TIME_INTRPT_DISABLE _IOW(IOC_1588_BASE, 15,\
> > + enum pch_auxmode)
> > +
> > +#define IOCTL_1588_AUX_TIME_POLL \
> > + _IOWR(IOC_1588_BASE, 16, struct pch_timepoll_ioctl)
> > +
> > +#define IOCTL_1588_RESET _IO(IOC_1588_BASE, 17)
> > +
> > +#define IOCTL_1588_CHNL_RESET _IOW(IOC_1588_BASE, 18, enum pch_ptpport)
> > +
> > +#define IOCTL_1588_STATS_GET _IOR(IOC_1588_BASE, 19, struct pch_stats)
> > +
> > +#define IOCTL_1588_STATS_RESET _IO(IOC_1588_BASE, 20)
> > +
> > +#define IOCTL_1588_SHOW_ALL _IO(IOC_1588_BASE, 21)
> > +
> > +#define IOCTL_1588_AUX_TARG_TIME_INTRPT_ENABLE _IO(IOC_1588_BASE, 22)
> > +
> > +#define IOCTL_1588_AUX_TARG_TIME_INTRPT_DISABLE _IO(IOC_1588_BASE, 23)
> > +
> > +#define IOCTL_1588_AUX_TARG_TIME_POLL \
> > + _IOR(IOC_1588_BASE, 24, struct pch_timepoll_ioctl)
> > +
> > +#define IOCTL_1588_AUX_TARG_TIME_SET \
> > + _IOW(IOC_1588_BASE, 25, struct pch_tim_val)
> > +
> > +#define IOCTL_1588_AUX_TARG_TIME_GET \
> > + _IOR(IOC_1588_BASE, 26, struct pch_tim_val)
> > +
> > +#define IOCTL_1588_PULSE_PER_SEC_INTRPT_ENABLE _IO(IOC_1588_BASE, 27)
> > +
> > +#define IOCTL_1588_PULSE_PER_SEC_INTRPT_DISABLE _IO(IOC_1588_BASE, 28)
> > +
> > +#define IOCTL_1588_TARG_TIME_NOTIFY \
> > + _IOR(IOC_1588_BASE, 29, struct pch_tim_val)
> > +
> > +#define IOCTL_1588_AUX_TIME_NOTIFY \
> > + _IOR(IOC_1588_BASE, 30, struct pch_auxtimeioctl)
> > +
> > +#define IOCTL_1588_AUX_TARG_TIME_NOTIFY \
> > + _IOR(IOC_1588_BASE, 31, struct pch_tim_val)
> > +
> > +#define IOCTL_1588_PULSE_PER_SEC_NOTIFY _IOR(IOC_1588_BASE, 32, __u32)
> > +
> > +#define IOCTL_1588_TARG_TIME_CLR_NOTIFY _IO(IOC_1588_BASE, 33)
> > +
> > +#define IOCTL_1588_AUX_TIME_CLR_NOTIFY _IO(IOC_1588_BASE, 34)
> > +
> > +#define IOCTL_1588_AUX_TARG_TIME_CLR_NOTIFY _IO(IOC_1588_BASE, 35)
> > +
> > +#define IOCTL_1588_PULSE_PER_SEC_CLR_NOTIFY _IO(IOC_1588_BASE, 36)
> > +
> > +#define IOCTL_1588_PULSE_PER_SEC_TIME_GET _IOR(IOC_1588_BASE, 37, __u32)
> > +
> > +#define IOCTL_1588_PULSE_PER_SEC_TIME_SET _IOW(IOC_1588_BASE, 38, __u32)
> > +
> > +#define IOCTL_1588_PORT_VERSION_SET \
> > + _IOW(IOC_1588_BASE, 39, struct pch_versionioctl)
> > +
> > +#define IOCTL_1588_PORT_VERSION_GET \
> > + _IOWR(IOC_1588_BASE, 40, struct pch_versionioctl)
> > +
> > +#define IOCTL_1588_PORT_OPERATION_MODE_SET \
> > + _IOW(IOC_1588_BASE, 41, struct pch_opemode_ioctl)
> > +
> > +#define IOCTL_1588_PORT_OPERATION_MODE_GET \
> > + _IOWR(IOC_1588_BASE, 42, struct pch_opemode_ioctl)
>
> Do they all have to be ioctls?  What exactly are they doing?
>
> And are they 32/64bit safe?
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>



  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-08-11  7:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-08-10 10:32 Masayuki Ohtak
2010-08-10 17:13 ` Greg KH
2010-08-10 17:37   ` Randy Dunlap
2010-08-11  1:20   ` Wang, Qi
2010-08-11  2:14     ` Masayuki Ohtake
2010-08-11  2:18       ` Wang, Qi
2010-08-11  2:31         ` Masayuki Ohtake
2010-08-11  5:49       ` Felipe Balbi
2010-08-11  6:31         ` Masayuki Ohtake
2010-08-11  7:29   ` Masayuki Ohtake [this message]
2010-08-11 15:15     ` Greg KH
2010-08-12  1:13       ` Wang, Qi
2010-08-12  2:00         ` Greg KH
2010-08-12  2:15           ` Wang, Qi
2010-08-17  7:12             ` Masayuki Ohtake
2010-08-17  9:06               ` [MeeGo-dev] " Richard Cochran
2010-08-17 11:25                 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-12-14  7:46                   ` [MeeGo-dev][PATCH] " Tomoya MORINAGA
2010-12-14 16:21                     ` Richard Cochran
2010-12-15 10:52                       ` Tomoya MORINAGA
2010-08-17 13:07               ` [MeeGo-Dev][PATCH] " Greg KH
2010-08-13  8:07           ` [MeeGo-dev] " Richard Cochran
2010-08-11  9:08 ` Robert Schwebel
2010-08-11 10:45   ` [MeeGo-Dev][PATCH] Topcliff: Update PCH_IEEE1588 driver to2.6.35 Masayuki Ohtake
2010-08-12  9:43     ` Richard Cochran
2010-08-11  4:34 [MeeGo-Dev][PATCH] Topcliff: Update PCH_IEEE1588 driver to 2.6.35 Masayuki Ohtake
2010-08-11  4:39 ` Greg KH
2010-08-11  6:30   ` Masayuki Ohtake

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='002601cb3926$edaf24d0$66f8800a@maildom.okisemi.com' \
    --to=masa-korg@dsn.okisemi.com \
    --cc=andrew.chih.howe.khor@intel.com \
    --cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=gregkh@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=meego-dev@meego.com \
    --cc=qi.wang@intel.com \
    --cc=yong.y.wang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome