Re: Multiple kprobes per address

["Rusty Lynch" <rusty@linux.co.intel.com>]

I was really only concerned with multiple consumers of kprobes.  So if
I were to create some tool that used kpobes to hook into the kernel, and
someone else were to create another tool that solved a different problem
but also used kprobes then the two tools wouldn't play nice with each other.

    -rustyl

----- Original Message -----
From: "Vamsi Krishna S ." <vamsi@in.ibm.com>
To: "Rusty Lynch" <rusty@linux.co.intel.com>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 12:05 AM
Subject: Re: Multiple kprobes per address


> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Nov 08, 2002 at 01:00:26PM -0800, Rusty Lynch wrote:
> > I noticed that kprobes is designed around the idea of only allowing
> > a single probe point per probe address.  Why not allow multiple probe
> > points for a given probe address?  Is it a way of limiting complexity?
> >
> We didn't think it would be useful and conceptually, it is simpler to
> think of one probe at an address.
>
> > It looks like it would be fairly straight forward to change
get_kprobe(addr)
> > to be get_kprobes(addr) where it returns a list of probe points
associated
> > with the address, and then tweak do_int3 to work through the entire
list.
> > Would such a change be acceptable?
> >
> It will be trivial to add this, but why? Is there a good reason
> for wanting to do this (multiple kprobes at same address) as opposed
> to doing all you want done on a probe hit in a single handler?
>
> Regards,
> Vamsi.
> --
> Vamsi Krishna S.
> Linux Technology Center,
> IBM Software Lab, Bangalore.
> Ph: +91 80 5044959
> Internet: vamsi@in.ibm.com