From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261957AbULPUGH (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Dec 2004 15:06:07 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261969AbULPUGH (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Dec 2004 15:06:07 -0500 Received: from dns.toxicfilms.tv ([150.254.37.24]:5529 "EHLO dns.toxicfilms.tv") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261957AbULPUGB (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Dec 2004 15:06:01 -0500 X-Qmail-Scanner-Mail-From: solt2@dns.toxicfilms.tv via dns X-Qmail-Scanner-Rcpt-To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org X-Qmail-Scanner: 1.23 (Clear:RC:0(213.238.100.99):. Processed in 0.193133 secs) Message-ID: <003901c4e3ab$d86c8580$0e25fe0a@pysiak> From: "Maciej Soltysiak" To: Subject: 2.6 flavours Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2004 21:13:56 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-2"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, AFAICS the -ac tree should be the most stable of all kernels, right? -mm is totally bleeding edge -bk the same -ck is experimental Others are experimental too. Looking at the changelogs, the most reasonable kernel to use for generic use are the -ac kernels, which I am going to use since 2.6.10 as long as Alan is kindly going to continue his fabulous work. I swear not to use 2.6.10 until Alan publishes 2.6.10-ac1 :-) Regards, Maciej