From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 6 May 2002 16:48:31 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 6 May 2002 16:48:30 -0400 Received: from rex.abanes.org ([216.54.200.227]:20465 "EHLO rex.abanes.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 6 May 2002 16:48:30 -0400 Message-ID: <003c01c1f53f$43427c60$94d4870a@office.abanes.org> From: "Michael Rothwell" To: , In-Reply-To: <3CD5ECEE.E6C0B894@kegel.com> <15574.52864.321544.44124@gargle.gargle.HOWL> Subject: Re: Tux in main kernel tree? (was khttpd rotten?) Date: Mon, 6 May 2002 16:47:40 -0400 Organization: Holly Springs, NC MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: "John Stoffel" > Or maybe we should include kDNS and kftpd as well now? Or even (laugh), an NFS server...