From: Philipp Hortmann <philipp.g.hortmann@gmail.com>
To: Yogesh Hegde <yogi.kernel@gmail.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: rtl8192e: Fix comparison to NULL of variable rf_set_sens
Date: Sun, 9 Apr 2023 17:12:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <004210bd-0ed1-58d5-0315-47499c850444@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZDK5UvVHa96ejEfU@Zephyrus-G14>
On 4/9/23 15:10, Yogesh Hegde wrote:
> Fix comparision to NULL of variable rf_set_sens as per Linux kernel
> coding-style. These issues were reported by checkpatch.pl.
>
> CHECK: Comparison to NULL could be written "priv->rf_set_sens"
> CHECK: Comparison to NULL could be written "!priv->rf_set_sens"
>
> Signed-off-by: Yogesh Hegde <yogi.kernel@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl8192e/rtl_wx.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl8192e/rtl_wx.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl8192e/rtl_wx.c
> index cb28288a618b..a67edb81a820 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl8192e/rtl_wx.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl8192e/rtl_wx.c
> @@ -311,7 +311,7 @@ static int _rtl92e_wx_get_range(struct net_device *dev,
> /* ~130 Mb/s real (802.11n) */
> range->throughput = 130 * 1000 * 1000;
>
> - if (priv->rf_set_sens != NULL)
> + if (priv->rf_set_sens)
> /* signal level threshold range */
> range->sensitivity = priv->max_sens;
>
> @@ -813,7 +813,7 @@ static int _rtl92e_wx_get_sens(struct net_device *dev,
> {
> struct r8192_priv *priv = rtllib_priv(dev);
>
> - if (priv->rf_set_sens == NULL)
> + if (!priv->rf_set_sens)
> return -1; /* we have not this support for this radio */
> wrqu->sens.value = priv->sens;
> return 0;
> @@ -831,7 +831,7 @@ static int _rtl92e_wx_set_sens(struct net_device *dev,
> return 0;
>
> mutex_lock(&priv->wx_mutex);
> - if (priv->rf_set_sens == NULL) {
> + if (!priv->rf_set_sens) {
> err = -1; /* we have not this support for this radio */
> goto exit;
> }
I would like you to do more.
I you search for rf_set_sens you will see that it is declared as a function.
But there is no definition of the function which will cause an oops when
this function is called.
Because there is no definition of the function the priv->rf_set_sens
will result always NULL
Bye Philipp
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-09 15:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-09 13:10 Yogesh Hegde
2023-04-09 15:12 ` Philipp Hortmann [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=004210bd-0ed1-58d5-0315-47499c850444@gmail.com \
--to=philipp.g.hortmann@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-staging@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=yogi.kernel@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®