From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.nsr.re.kr (unknown [210.104.33.65]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4540179EE; Mon, 18 Dec 2023 07:33:26 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=nsr.re.kr Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=nsr.re.kr Received: from 210.104.33.70 (nsr.re.kr) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128 bits)) by mail.nsr.re.kr with SMTP; Mon, 18 Dec 2023 16:33:09 +0900 X-Sender: letrhee@nsr.re.kr Received: from 192.168.155.188 ([192.168.155.188]) by mail.nsr.re.kr (Crinity Message Backbone-7.0.1) with SMTP ID 291; Mon, 18 Dec 2023 16:33:05 +0900 (KST) From: Dongsoo Lee To: 'Herbert Xu' , "'David S. Miller'" , 'Jens Axboe' , 'Eric Biggers' , "'Theodore Y. Ts'o'" , 'Jaegeuk Kim' , 'Thomas Gleixner' , 'Ingo Molnar' , 'Borislav Petkov' , 'Dave Hansen' , x86@kernel.org, "'H. Peter Anvin'" , 'Dongsoo Lee' Cc: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20231205010329.21996-1-letrehee@nsr.re.kr> In-Reply-To: <20231205010329.21996-1-letrehee@nsr.re.kr> Subject: RE: [PATCH v6 0/5] crypto: LEA block cipher implementation Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2023 16:33:01 +0900 Message-ID: <004701da3184$6e090560$4a1b1020$@nsr.re.kr> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0 Thread-Index: AQKQdsWb5UD+xQlqqHr8cbxlcEv/nK9CGvZQ Content-Language: ko (Resend mail because of an error) Hello, I'm checking in on the status of the patch submitted to the Linux kernel = group. I understand the review process takes time, and we appreciate = your team's efforts. While awaiting review, is there anything specific we can do to enhance = the patch's acceptance chances? Your guidance would be greatly = appreciated. Thank you, Dongsoo Lee