From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S264272AbRFTHWi>; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 03:22:38 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S264744AbRFTHW3>; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 03:22:29 -0400
Received: from echo.computel.nl ([195.86.135.229]:12557 "HELO echo.computel.nl")
	by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id <S264272AbRFTHWN>;
	Wed, 20 Jun 2001 03:22:13 -0400
Message-ID: <004b01c0f959$af9d96c0$8e01a8c0@OFFICE>
From: "Sander Steffann" <steffann@nederland.net>
To: <vlan@Scry.WANfear.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: "Holger Kiehl" <Holger.Kiehl@dwd.de>, "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>,
        "VLAN Mailing List" <vlan@Scry.WANfear.com>,
        "Lennert" <buytenh@gnu.org>, "Gleb Natapov" <gleb@nbase.co.il>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0106191016200.27487-100000@talentix.dwd.de> <3B2FCE0C.67715139@candelatech.com>
Subject: Re: [VLAN] Should VLANs be devices or something else?
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 09:21:55 +0200
Organization: Computel Standby BV
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Hi Ben & all,

> Should VLANs be devices or some other thing?

VLANs should be devices IMHO. It 'feels' right, and I think it's what most
(if not all) users expect them to be.

Bye,
Sander.