mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com>
To: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>
Cc: X86 Kernel <x86@kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	<linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Andi Kleen <andi.kleen@intel.com>, Xin Li <xin3.li@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] x86/irq: Add enumeration of NMI source reporting CPU feature
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2024 18:08:14 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <004f6400-0d35-4c5e-ad31-094be8860f08@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240621164615.051217c4@jacob-builder>


>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpuid-deps.c
>> b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpuid-deps.c
>> index b7d9f530ae16..39526041e91a 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpuid-deps.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpuid-deps.c
>> @@ -84,6 +84,7 @@ static const struct cpuid_dep cpuid_deps[] = {
>>         { X86_FEATURE_SHSTK,                    X86_FEATURE_XSAVES    },
>>         { X86_FEATURE_FRED,                     X86_FEATURE_LKGS      },
>>         { X86_FEATURE_FRED,                     X86_FEATURE_WRMSRNS   },
>> +       { X86_FEATURE_NMI_SOURCE,		X86_FEATURE_FRED      },
>>         {}
>>  };
> If FRED is never reported by CPUID, then there would not be any calls to
> setup_clear_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_FRED), so this table does not help clear
> the dependent NMI_SOURCE, right?
> 

I thought there was a common function for all features. I expected it to
go through each feature and clear the ones whose dependency is missing.
But I can't find it easily. Maybe someone else knows this better.

However, anytime do_clear_cpu_cap() is called for any feature it does
the below and scans the cpuid_deps table to clear all features with
missing dependencies. That would cause X86_FEATURE_NMI_SOURCE to be
cleared one way or another.


	/* Loop until we get a stable state. */
	do {
		changed = false;
		for (d = cpuid_deps; d->feature; d++) {
			if (!test_bit(d->depends, disable))
				continue;
			if (__test_and_set_bit(d->feature, disable))
				continue;

			changed = true;
			clear_feature(c, d->feature);
		}
	} while (changed);


> In the next version, I will add runtime disable if HW malfunctions. i.e. no
> valid bitmask.
> 

I don't think we do this for other features that have a missing
dependency. It doesn't seem NMI source is any different from them.

> Maybe we can also add a big WARN_ON like this:
> if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_FRED) &&
> 		cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_NMI_SOURCE)) 
> 	setup_clear_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_NMI_SOURCE);
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jacob


  reply	other threads:[~2024-06-22  1:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-06-11 16:54 Jacob Pan
2024-06-11 16:54 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] x86/irq: Add enumeration of NMI source reporting CPU feature Jacob Pan
2024-06-12  2:32   ` Xin Li
2024-06-12  2:50     ` H. Peter Anvin
2024-06-12  3:04       ` Xin Li
2024-06-21 23:00     ` Sohil Mehta
2024-06-28  5:00       ` Jacob Pan
2024-06-21 22:23   ` Sohil Mehta
2024-06-21 23:46     ` Jacob Pan
2024-06-22  1:08       ` Sohil Mehta [this message]
2024-06-27 22:23         ` Jacob Pan
2024-06-27 23:20           ` Sohil Mehta
2024-06-11 16:54 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] x86/irq: Extend NMI handler registration interface to include source Jacob Pan
2024-06-24 23:16   ` Sohil Mehta
2024-06-28  4:56     ` Jacob Pan
2024-06-11 16:54 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] x86/irq: Factor out common NMI handling code Jacob Pan
2024-06-11 16:54 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] x86/irq: Process nmi sources in NMI handler Jacob Pan
2024-06-11 18:41   ` H. Peter Anvin
2024-06-12 21:54     ` Jacob Pan
2024-06-24 23:38       ` Sohil Mehta
2024-06-24 23:53   ` Sohil Mehta
2024-06-11 16:54 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] perf/x86: Enable NMI source reporting for perfmon Jacob Pan
2024-06-11 19:10   ` H. Peter Anvin
2024-06-12 20:27     ` Jacob Pan
2024-06-11 16:54 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] x86/irq: Enable NMI source on IPIs delivered as NMI Jacob Pan
2024-06-12  2:04 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-06-12  2:55   ` Re: Xin Li

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=004f6400-0d35-4c5e-ad31-094be8860f08@intel.com \
    --to=sohil.mehta@intel.com \
    --cc=andi.kleen@intel.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=xin3.li@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®