From: "Sumit Pandya" <sumit@elitecore.com>
To: "Zwane Mwaikambo" <zwane@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <joern@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de>
Subject: Re: Infinite do_IRQ
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 20:14:25 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <005c01c3aeab$a0aa93c0$3901a8c0@elite.co.in> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.53.0311190332320.11537@montezuma.fsmlabs.com>
Hi Zwane,
I'm sorry to bother you again. Following is output from
http://kernelnewbies.org/scripts/check-stack.sh
100 getxattr
100 pirq_peer_trick
100 removexattr
100 setxattr
100 sys_reboot
100 sys_recvmsg
108 rt_cache_get_info
108 sg_proc_hoststrs_info
10c rs_read_proc
110 autofs4_notify_daemon
110 set_serial_info
110 sys_sendmsg
114 scsi_request_sense
11c autofs4_expire_run
11c radeon_cp_clear
11c scan_scsis
128 aout_core_dump
13c load_elf_binary
140 do_execve
140 mmc_ioctl
140 vc_resize
144 elf_kcore_store_hdr
170 sg_ioctl
178 extract_entropy
190 sys_msgctl
1a0 scsi_reset_provider
1a4 sys_shmctl
1ac check_tcp_syn_cookie
1b0 tcp_timewait_state_process
1b4 ip_getsockopt
1cc secure_tcp_syn_cookie
1d0 tcp_v4_conn_request
1d4 sys_semtimedop
1d8 tcp_check_req
204 cdrom_buffer_sectors
224 cdrom_read_intr
228 ip_setsockopt
248 semctl_main
258 elf_core_dump
2a8 pci_do_scan_bus
2f4 vt_ioctl
31c sym53c8xx_detect
324 pcibios_fixup_peer_bridges
324 pci_sanity_check
410 cdrom_number_of_slots
410 cdrom_select_disc
410 cdrom_slot_status
444 cdrom_ioctl
47c ide_unregister
490 inflate_fixed
524 inflate_dynamic
5a8 huft_build
73c sanitize_e820_map
Any comments on this? Thanks in advance
-- Sumit
----- Original Message -----
From: "Zwane Mwaikambo" <zwane@arm.linux.org.uk>
Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 2:17 PM
> On Wed, 19 Nov 2003, Sumit Pandya wrote:
>
> > Hi All,
> > I'm running 2.4.22 kernel on Pentium-III processor with following
few
> > patches
> > 1. ebtables-brnf-3_vs_2.4.22.diff
> > 2. routes-2.4.22-9.diff (Julean's DGD)
> > 3. nfnetlink-ctnetlink-0.12-2.patch
> > 4. htb_3.12_3.13.diff
>
> That's quite the patch cocktail, perhaps they need some auditing on stack
> usage.
>
> > After running it for few time suddenly it hangs and I get continuous
> > "do_IRQ: stack overflow:" messages on my serial console. I'm using
ttywatch
> > for reading console output on other Linux System.
[snip]
>
> The i386 stack grows downwards, so if anything it'll report even earlier
> than what you're hitting now. I'd recommend backing out those patches one
by
> one until you find out the offending patch and then perhaps do the stack
> usage audit from there.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-11-19 14:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-11-19 7:28 Sumit Pandya
2003-11-19 8:47 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2003-11-19 14:44 ` Sumit Pandya [this message]
2003-11-20 4:12 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2003-11-20 10:05 ` Jörn Engel
2003-11-20 10:08 ` Jörn Engel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='005c01c3aeab$a0aa93c0$3901a8c0@elite.co.in' \
--to=sumit@elitecore.com \
--cc=joern@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=zwane@arm.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®