RE: [PATCH 1/2] pinctrl: correct a offset while enumerating pins

[Chanho Park <chanho61.park@samsung.com>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Linus Walleij [mailto:linus.walleij@linaro.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2012 4:59 PM
> To: Chanho Park
> Cc: swarren@nvidia.com; Baohua.Song@csr.com; linux-
> kernel@vger.kernel.org; Kyungmin Park
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] pinctrl: correct a offset while enumerating
> pins
> 
> On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 8:47 AM, Chanho Park <chanho61.park@samsung.com>
> wrote:
> 
> This:
> 
> > -               /* Pin space may be sparse */
> > +               /* Skip if we cannot search the pin */
> (...)
> > -               /* Pin space may be sparse */
> > +               /* Skip if we cannot search the pin */
> 
> I don't see why you're changing that comment, it is still true that
> the pin space may be sparse and that is what your patch confirms.
> 
> So I will restore that comment...

We do not concern that pin space is sparse
because we enumerate the pin space using the offset of array.
This situation is that we cannot search the pin from radix tree.
It is BUGON() or just skip this pin :)

Best regards,
Chanho Park