From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 19 Feb 2003 06:16:06 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 19 Feb 2003 06:16:06 -0500 Received: from mail.uptime.at ([62.116.87.11]:54447 "EHLO mail.uptime.at") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id convert rfc822-to-8bit; Wed, 19 Feb 2003 06:16:04 -0500 Received-Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 12:24:40 +0100 From: "Oliver Pitzeier" To: "=?iso-8859-1?Q?'M=E5ns_Rullg=E5rd'?=" , Subject: RE: Module problems (WAS: RE: 2.5.62 on Alpha SUCCESS (2.6 release soon!?)) Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 12:24:22 +0100 Organization: UPtime system solutions Message-ID: <008101c2d809$74e7d190$020b10ac@pitzeier.priv.at> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.4510 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 In-Reply-To: Importance: Normal X-MailScanner: clean X-MailScanner-Information: Please contact UPtime Systemloesungen for more information X-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-1.6, required 5.3, AWL, IN_REP_TO, NOSPAM_INC, PLING_QUERY, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT, SPAM_PHRASE_00_01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Måns Rullgård wrote: [ ... ] > > Maybe I should upgrade gcc? But I believe 3.1 is working fine... At > > least for my normally... > > I got those relocation errors when using gcc 3.1 and too old > modutils, but you seem to have the latest version. Try > changing to binutils 2.12. It works for me, but 2.13 doesn't. I'm currently upgrading the whole system... Let's see what I get. :-) Best regards, Oliver