mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Chul Lee" <chullee@core.kaist.ac.kr>
To: "Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk" <roy@karlsbakk.net>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: "khttpd mailing list" <khttpd-users@zgp.org>
Subject: Re: [khttpd-users] khttpd vs tux
Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2001 14:26:00 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <008f01c164f1$30a06b00$9da5f88f@kaist.ac.kr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0111031720270.8761-100000@mustard.heime.net>

You had better refer a paper whose tile is High-Performance Memory-Based Web Servers: Kernel and User-Space Performance, by Philippe  at IBM.T.J Watson
They also have experiments on performance between various kernel mode web server and user mode web server.

Chul

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk" <roy@karlsbakk.net>
To: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: "khttpd mailing list" <khttpd-users@zgp.org>
Sent: Sunday, November 04, 2001 1:21 AM
Subject: [khttpd-users] khttpd vs tux


> hi
> 
> can someone tell me what the difference is, in functionality, speed etc.
> between the tux (2.0?) webserver and khttpd? I'm working on a project
> where all I need is raw speed - really raw speed - and I really don't know
> which to choose.
> 
> roy
> 
> ---
> Computers are like air conditioners.
> They stop working when you open Windows.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> khttpd-users maillist  -  khttpd-users@zgp.org
> http://zgp.org/mailman/listinfo/khttpd-users


  parent reply	other threads:[~2001-11-04  5:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-11-03 16:21 Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
2001-11-03 16:28 ` bert hubert
2001-11-03 16:45   ` Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
2001-11-03 16:49     ` bert hubert
2001-11-04  5:26 ` Chul Lee [this message]
     [not found] <20011103162642.A25824@fenrus.demon.nl>
2001-11-03 16:43 ` [khttpd-users] " Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
2001-11-03 18:18   ` Miquel van Smoorenburg
2001-11-03 20:24   ` Dirk Moerenhout
     [not found] <20011103165129.B26040@fenrus.demon.nl>
2001-11-03 16:56 ` Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
     [not found] <3BE42379.2050604@bewegungsmelder.de>
2001-11-03 17:08 ` Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
     [not found] <3BE427CD.702@bewegungsmelder.de>
2001-11-03 18:02 ` Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
2001-11-03 19:08   ` Thomas Lussnig
2001-11-03 19:14     ` Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
2001-11-03 19:21     ` Alan Cox
2001-11-03 19:18       ` Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
2001-11-03 19:31         ` J Sloan
2001-11-04  1:19           ` Alan Cox
2001-11-05 10:15           ` Ingo Molnar
2001-11-06  4:46             ` J Sloan
2001-11-03 19:37         ` Alan Cox
2001-11-04  0:07         ` Erik Mouw
2001-11-04 15:32           ` John Alvord

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='008f01c164f1$30a06b00$9da5f88f@kaist.ac.kr' \
    --to=chullee@core.kaist.ac.kr \
    --cc=khttpd-users@zgp.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=roy@karlsbakk.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®