From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 21 Oct 2002 11:43:55 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 21 Oct 2002 11:43:55 -0400 Received: from smtp1.home.se ([195.66.35.200]:39356 "EHLO smtp1.home.se") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 21 Oct 2002 11:43:54 -0400 Message-ID: <009501c27919$7fac8070$0219450a@sandos> From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?John_B=E4ckstrand?= To: Subject: Re: Problem with thinkpad 760xl, (Trident FB) TGUI 96xx Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 17:49:53 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > I have a IBM Thinkpad 760XL, with a trident in it, > giving this from lspci -v -v: > > 00:03.0 VGA compatible controller: Trident Microsystems > TGUI 9660/968x/968x (rev d3) (prog-if 00 [VGA]) > Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster- SpecCycle- > MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- > Status: Cap- 66Mhz- UDF- FastB2B+ ParErr- > DEVSEL=medium >TAbort- SERR- Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 11 > Region 0: Memory at 08000000 (32-bit, > non-prefetchable) [size=4M] > Region 1: Memory at 08400000 (32-bit, > non-prefetchable) [size=64K] > Region 2: Memory at 08800000 (32-bit, > non-prefetchable) [size=4M] > Expansion ROM at 000c0000 [disabled] [size=64K] > > The tridentfb driver isnt working very good, the output > on screen is in some way interlaced in some odd way. I > have a .png here: Forgot the link: http://medlem.spray.se/sandos/thinkpad.jpg The characters does seem to be solid in this jpeg, but they have every second scanline black/ displaced. > I have also not been able to get Xfree 4.2.1 working, > but that seems to be another problem, seems the > modeline isnt right. The tridentfb driver seems to be > more on course, since the screen is atleast stable, not > unsycnched "noise" as in X, only weirdly interleaved. > Any ideas? Is this 760XL in some way different from > others of the same brand, since others seem to have > better luck? > > --- > John Bäckstrand >