From: "James Stevenson" <james@stev.org>
To: "Andrey Borzenkov" <arvidjaar@mail.ru>,
"Brian King" <brking@charter.net>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Re[2]: OOPS in idescsi_end_request
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2003 09:06:44 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <00b601c2c387$ebc51c00$0cfea8c0@ezdsp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E18bxDI-000Ic3-00@f15.mail.ru>
[LARGE SNIP]
> Would you agree to test the patch (possibly next week).
yeah sure.
> cheers
>
> -andrey
>
> > >
> > > If you can reliably reproduce the problem you could give it a try.
> > >
> > > Anybody sees yet another race condition here? :))
> > >
> > > -andrey
> > >
> > >
> > >>While burning a CD tonight I ended up taking an oops on my system. I
had
> > >>the lkcd patch applied to my 2.4.19 kernel, so I was able to look at
the
> > >> oops after my system rebooted. After digging into it a little and
> > >>looking at the ide-scsi code I think I found the problem but am not
> > >>sure. How can idescsi_reset simply return SCSI_RESET_SUCCESS to the
scsi
> > >>mid layer? I think what is happening is that a command times out,
> > >>idescsi_abort is called, which returns SCSI_ABORT_SNOOZE. Later on
> > >>idescsi_reset gets called, which returns SCSI_RESET_SUCCESS. At this
> > >>point the scsi mid-layer owns the scsi_cmnd and returns the failure
back
> > >>up the chain. Later on, the command gets run through
> > >>idescsi_end_request, which then tries to access the scsi_cmnd
structure
> > >>which is it no longer owns.
> > >>
> > >>Any help is appreciated. I have a complete lkcd dump of the failure if
> > >>anyone would like more information...
> > >>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-01-24 8:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-01-23 8:52 Andrey Borzenkov
2003-01-23 9:19 ` Strong kernel lock with linux-2.5.59 : futex in Huge Pages dada1
2003-01-23 9:41 ` Andrew Morton
2003-01-24 3:15 ` OOPS in idescsi_end_request Brian King
2003-01-24 6:21 ` Re[2]: " Andrey Borzenkov
2003-01-24 9:06 ` James Stevenson [this message]
2003-01-24 13:39 ` Brian King
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='00b601c2c387$ebc51c00$0cfea8c0@ezdsp.com' \
--to=james@stev.org \
--cc=arvidjaar@mail.ru \
--cc=brking@charter.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome