From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on
	aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org
Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18])
	by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01BC7C61D85
	for <linux-kernel@archiver.kernel.org>; Tue, 21 Nov 2023 01:01:04 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S232781AbjKUBBG (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@archiver.kernel.org>);
        Mon, 20 Nov 2023 20:01:06 -0500
Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:37360 "EHLO
        lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S229496AbjKUBBD (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Mon, 20 Nov 2023 20:01:03 -0500
Received: from vps0.lunn.ch (vps0.lunn.ch [156.67.10.101])
        by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5FCD5A2;
        Mon, 20 Nov 2023 17:01:00 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lunn.ch;
        s=20171124; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Disposition:Content-Type:MIME-Version:
        References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:From:Sender:Reply-To:Subject:
        Date:Message-ID:To:Cc:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:
        Content-ID:Content-Description:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To:References;
        bh=pgxhEJrdQqIa04MmNzZIomTiih7sAHwADqYuA6fFOz0=; b=lgYwcm55G1nJZvTxTzPYtGaPrT
        GAkKkpg5OtBAfv3bZeYfxm50N1pLnK2VcB+ukNRnfl6Y/h0Tezz1AdRgoBrpOK1oJD5jc2n+3eMs+
        cA5Q7gYhyohBavmJo2M70kHU+Ht24ZzgSwa0x1q1SCFYAWRqBkfuhKZRMPY7EP2A7mWM=;
Received: from andrew by vps0.lunn.ch with local (Exim 4.94.2)
        (envelope-from <andrew@lunn.ch>)
        id 1r5F8M-000hzA-5l; Tue, 21 Nov 2023 02:00:58 +0100
Date:   Tue, 21 Nov 2023 02:00:58 +0100
From:   Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
To:     Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com>
Cc:     davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
        Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>,
        Herve Codina <herve.codina@bootlin.com>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
        Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
        Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>,
        =?iso-8859-1?Q?K=F6ry?= Maincent <kory.maincent@bootlin.com>,
        Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next v2 04/10] net: sfp: Add helper to return the
 SFP bus name
Message-ID: <00d26b50-56f1-4eac-a37f-36cf321bd46a@lunn.ch>
References: <20231117162323.626979-1-maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com>
 <20231117162323.626979-5-maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20231117162323.626979-5-maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com>
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

> +const char *sfp_get_name(struct sfp_bus *bus)
> +{
> +	if (bus->sfp_dev)
> +		return dev_name(bus->sfp_dev);
> +
> +	return NULL;
> +}

Locking? Do you assume rtnl? Does this function need to take rtnl?

	 Andrew