From: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
To: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
LAK <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@gmail.com>,
Brendan Jackman <Brendan.Jackman@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] arm: topology: remove cpu_efficiency
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2017 11:37:06 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <00d4d98e-3d75-377f-434d-dce47c0629dd@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKfTPtARJC161pXeqrz_d5wxqXPLczGCm_dbZ3fW54CAXuDTmQ@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Vincent,
On 17/10/17 13:28, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> Hi Dietmar,
>
> On 12 October 2017 at 16:00, Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com> wrote:
>> Remove the 'cpu_efficiency/clock-frequency dt property' based solution
>> to set cpu capacity which was only working for Cortex-A15/A7 arm
>> big.LITTLE systems.
>>
>> I.e. the 'capacity-dmips-mhz' based solution is now the only one. It is
>> shared between arm and arm64 and works for every big.LITTLE system no
>> matter which core types it consists of.
>>
>> Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
>> Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
>> Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@gmail.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
[...]
>> @@ -111,76 +50,15 @@ static void __init parse_dt_topology(void)
>> continue;
>> }
>>
>> - if (topology_parse_cpu_capacity(cn, cpu)) {
>> + if (topology_parse_cpu_capacity(cn, cpu))
>> of_node_put(cn);
>
> We should call the of_node_put unconditionally to balance the
> of_get_cpu_node, isn't it ?
> Note that this problem is also present without your change
Thanks for the review. Brendan mentioned this the other day already.
I could add an additional patch to the v3 with this code change. What do
you think?
diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/topology.c b/arch/arm/kernel/topology.c
index 15cc131ae387..81ec42333489 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/topology.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/topology.c
@@ -41,6 +41,7 @@ static void __init parse_dt_topology(void)
pr_err("No CPU information found in DT\n");
return;
}
+ of_node_put(cn);
for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
/* too early to use cpu->of_node */
@@ -50,8 +51,8 @@ static void __init parse_dt_topology(void)
continue;
}
- if (topology_parse_cpu_capacity(cn, cpu))
- of_node_put(cn);
+ topology_parse_cpu_capacity(cn, cpu);
+ of_node_put(cn);
}
topology_normalize_cpu_scale();
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-18 10:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-12 14:00 [PATCH v2 0/1] arm: " Dietmar Eggemann
2017-10-12 14:00 ` [PATCH v2 1/1] arm: topology: " Dietmar Eggemann
2017-10-17 12:28 ` Vincent Guittot
2017-10-18 10:37 ` Dietmar Eggemann [this message]
2017-10-19 7:32 ` Vincent Guittot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=00d4d98e-3d75-377f-434d-dce47c0629dd@arm.com \
--to=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=Brendan.Jackman@arm.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®