mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steven Cole <scole@lanl.gov>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <marcelo@conectiva.com.br>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 2.4.1pre8 slowdown on dbench tests
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2001 10:03:41 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <01012410034100.03192@spc.esa.lanl.gov> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <01012208583400.01639@spc.esa.lanl.gov> <01012409085700.02477@spc.esa.lanl.gov> <20010124174439.W16110@suse.de>
In-Reply-To: <20010124174439.W16110@suse.de>

On Wednesday 24 January 2001 09:44, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 24 2001, Steven Cole wrote:
> > > Thanks! Could I talk you into doing one last run? pre8 with
> > > include/linux/elevator.h having these values set for
> > > ELEVATOR_LINUS:
> >
> > Here are two sets of dbench 48 runs with that mod. I can't explain why
> > the second set is faster.  The second set was performed with no reboot
> > after the first set.  The individual runs were performed with no wait
> > in-between.
>
> Was this the 2.4.1-pre8x tree? Regardless, it's about back to the

Yes, that kernel included the other change which was to blkdev.h which 
you suggested.  I ran dbench 48 four more times right after the previous 
email.  Here are those results, using exactly the same kernel (2.4.1-pre8 
with changes to blkdev.h and elevator.h).

Throughput 9.52243 MB/sec (NB=11.903 MB/sec  95.2243 MBit/sec)
Throughput 9.98258 MB/sec (NB=12.4782 MB/sec  99.8258 MBit/sec)
Throughput 9.41459 MB/sec (NB=11.7682 MB/sec  94.1459 MBit/sec)
Throughput 9.23102 MB/sec (NB=11.5388 MB/sec  92.3102 MBit/sec)

Steven
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

  reply	other threads:[~2001-01-24 17:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <01012208583400.01639@spc.esa.lanl.gov>
2001-01-22 20:30 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2001-01-22 23:11   ` Jens Axboe
2001-01-23 20:29     ` Steven Cole
2001-01-23 20:54       ` Jens Axboe
2001-01-24 16:08         ` Steven Cole
2001-01-24 16:44           ` Jens Axboe
2001-01-24 17:03             ` Steven Cole [this message]
2001-01-18 22:52 Steven Cole
2001-01-18 21:49 ` Marcelo Tosatti
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-01-18 17:17 Marcelo Tosatti
2001-01-18 20:18 ` Szabolcs Szakacsits
2001-01-19  2:23   ` Szabolcs Szakacsits
2001-01-19  2:13     ` Jens Axboe
2001-01-19  5:49       ` Szabolcs Szakacsits
2001-01-19  0:16 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-01-18 23:51   ` Marcelo Tosatti
2001-01-19  1:43     ` Jens Axboe
2001-01-19  1:40   ` Jens Axboe
2001-01-19  1:46     ` Andi Kleen
2001-01-19  1:47       ` Jens Axboe
2001-01-19  2:08         ` Andi Kleen
2001-01-19  2:10           ` Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=01012410034100.03192@spc.esa.lanl.gov \
    --to=scole@lanl.gov \
    --cc=axboe@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marcelo@conectiva.com.br \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®