From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 30 Jan 2001 11:14:58 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 30 Jan 2001 11:14:48 -0500 Received: from dns-229.dhcp-248.nai.com ([161.69.248.229]:45813 "HELO localdomain") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Tue, 30 Jan 2001 11:14:33 -0500 From: Davide Libenzi Organization: myCIO.com Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 08:15:39 -0800 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.1.95.5] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Cc: "Romain Kang" , , , "Craig I. Hagan" To: "Micah Gorrell" , "Andrey Savochkin" In-Reply-To: <003001c08acf$7ae475f0$9b2f4189@angelw2k> In-Reply-To: <003001c08acf$7ae475f0$9b2f4189@angelw2k> Subject: Re: eepro100 - Linux vs. FreeBSD MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <01013008153900.01000@ewok.dev.mycio.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tuesday 30 January 2001 08:14, Micah Gorrell wrote: > I have been running 2.2 on many machines since its release and have updated > to the latest version of 2.2 many times. All of these machines have an > eepro100 and I never saw a single problem with any of them. I updated most > of my machines to 2.4 over the course of a week and within a day of > updating each of them showed the problem. This may be pure chance but it > sounds to me as if it is a difference with the 2.4 kernel. I had the same problem on my dual PIII with a dual eepro100 NIC. 2.4.1-pre12 solved the problem ( don't ask me why :) ). - Davide - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/