From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 8 Sep 2001 04:20:09 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 8 Sep 2001 04:20:00 -0400 Received: from femail48.sdc1.sfba.home.com ([24.254.60.42]:22435 "EHLO femail48.sdc1.sfba.home.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 8 Sep 2001 04:19:53 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Nicholas Knight Reply-To: tegeran@home.com To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.4.10-pre5 Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2001 01:19:38 -0700 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2] In-Reply-To: <3B99A8C2.56E88CE3@isn.net> <003001c1382d$f483d9d0$010da8c0@uglypunk> <20010908014643.A846@home.com> In-Reply-To: <20010908014643.A846@home.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <01090801193801.00271@c779218-a> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Friday 07 September 2001 11:46 pm, Josh McKinney wrote: > On approximately Sat, Sep 08, 2001 at 03:44:31PM +0930, Kingsley Foreman wrote: > > Yes i got this too > > anyone got a fix > > Don't use gcc-3.0 Excuse me, but shouldn't it be a goal to have the kernel compiling cleanly on gcc-3.0 as soon as is reasonable? Telling people to use older versions of GCC for the kernel is not really a "good" thing if it can be avoided. Personaly I don't use gcc-3.0 yet, but some do, and many will follow, and when they do, it'd be nice to have the kernel compiling cleanly, would it not? They want a fix, not a one-line editorial. They're reporting a "bug", so that it may be fixed.